Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37698985›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Opportunities to sustain a multi-country quality of care network: Lessons on the actions of four countries Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Malawi, and Uganda.

Seblewengel Lemma, Callie Daniels-Howell, Asebe Amenu Tufa, Mithun Sarker, Kohenour Akter, Catherine Nakidde, Gloria Seruwagi, Albert Dube, Kondwani Mwandira, QCN Evaluation Group and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Seblewengel LemmaDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, based in Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5910-3723
Callie Daniels-HowellInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3238-9375
Asebe Amenu TufaHealth System Directorate, Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Mithun SarkerPerinatal Care Project, Diabetic Association of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Kohenour AkterPerinatal Care Project, Diabetic Association of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0409-1099
Catherine NakiddeSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8965-3582
Gloria SeruwagiSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7280-6164
Albert DubeParent and Child Health Initiative PACHI, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Kondwani MwandiraParent and Child Health Initiative PACHI, Lilongwe, Malawi.
QCN Evaluation Group
Desalegn Bekele TayeMinistry of Health, Health Service Quality Directorate, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5154-2155
Mike EnglishCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Yusra Ribhi ShawarBloomberg School of Public Health and Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Kasonde MwabaInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nehla DjellouliInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4200-2314
Tim ColbournInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6917-6552
Tanya MarchantDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, based in Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4228-4334
Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention · ETUniversity College London · GBGovernment of Ethiopia · ETJohns Hopkins University · USMakerere University · UGPublic Health Institute of Malawi · MWEthiopian Public Health Institute · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Quality of Care Network (QCN) is a global initiative that was established in 2017 under the leadership of WHO in 11 low-and- middle income countries to improve maternal, newborn, and child health. The vision was that the Quality of Care Network would be embedded within member countries and continued beyond the initial implementation period: that the Network would be sustained. This paper investigated the experience of actions taken to sustain QCN in four Network countries (Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Malawi, and Uganda) and reports on lessons learned. Multiple iterative rounds of data collection were conducted through qualitative interviews with global and national stakeholders, and non-participatory observation of health facilities and meetings. A total of 241 interviews, 42 facility and four meeting observations were carried out. We conducted a thematic analysis of all data using a framework approach that defined six critical actions that can be taken to promote sustainability. The analysis revealed that these critical actions were present with varying degrees in each of the four countries. Although vulnerabilities were observed, there was good evidence to support that actions were taken to institutionalize the innovation within the health system, to motivate micro-level actors, plan opportunities for reflection and adaptation from the outset, and to support strong government ownership. Two actions were largely absent and weakened confidence in future sustainability: managing financial uncertainties and fostering community ownership. Evidence from four countries suggested that the QCN model would not be sustained in its original format, largely because of financial vulnerability and insufficient time to embed the innovation at the sub-national level. But especially the efforts made to institutionalize the innovation in existing systems meant that some characteristics of QCN may be carried forward within broader government quality improvement initiatives.

Identifiers

PMID37698985
PMCPMC10497147
OpenAlexW4386691697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.