Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37698914›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

Construction of an Emotional Lexicon of Patients With Breast Cancer: Development and Sentiment Analysis.

Chaixiu Li, Jiaqi Fu, Jie Lai, Lijun Sun, Chunlan Zhou, Wenji Li, Biao Jian, Shisi Deng, Yujie Zhang, Zihan Guo and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Narrative medicine in patients with cancer during intravenous antiblastic therapy: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chaixiu Li *Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2303-0643
Jiaqi Fu *Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5353-6835
Jie Lai *Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4919-8196
Lijun Sun *China Electronic Product Reliability and Environmental Testing Institute, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0001-6484-438X
Chunlan ZhouNanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1998-5594
Wenji LiNanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6428-3623
Biao JianChina Electronic Product Reliability and Environmental Testing Institute, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0001-7216-1298
Shisi DengNanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0003-1454-7592
Yujie ZhangNanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0009-9305-2718
Zihan GuoNanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0005-3375-1075
Yusheng LiuNanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0005-2110-8293
Yanni ZhouNanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0004-1487-550X
Shihui XieNanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0006-2332-4931
Mingyue HouNanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0007-1830-2882
Ru WangNanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0003-0242-3701
Qinjie ChenNanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0009-3919-8388
Yanni WuNanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1938-2785
Nanfang Hospital · CNChina Electronic Product Reliability and Environmental Test Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe innovative method of sentiment analysis based on an emotional lexicon shows prominent advantages in capturing emotional information, such as individual attitudes, experiences, and needs, which provides a new perspective and method for emotion recognition and management for patients with breast cancer (BC). However, at present, sentiment analysis in the field of BC is limited, and there is no emotional lexicon for this field. Therefore, it is necessary to construct an emotional lexicon that conforms to the characteristics of patients with BC so as to provide a new tool for accurate identification and analysis of the patients' emotions and a new method for their personalized emotion management.

objectiveThis study aimed to construct an emotional lexicon of patients with BC.

methodsEmotional words were obtained by merging the words in 2 general sentiment lexicons, the Chinese Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (C-LIWC) and HowNet, and the words in text corpora acquired from patients with BC via Weibo, semistructured interviews, and expressive writing. The lexicon was constructed using manual annotation and classification under the guidance of Russell's valence-arousal space. Ekman's basic emotional categories, Lazarus' cognitive appraisal theory of emotion, and a qualitative text analysis based on the text corpora of patients with BC were combined to determine the fine-grained emotional categories of the lexicon we constructed. Precision, recall, and the F1-score were used to evaluate the lexicon's performance.

resultsThe text corpora collected from patients in different stages of BC included 150 written materials, 17 interviews, and 6689 original posts and comments from Weibo, with a total of 1,923,593 Chinese characters. The emotional lexicon of patients with BC contained 9357 words and covered 8 fine-grained emotional categories: joy, anger, sadness, fear, disgust, surprise, somatic symptoms, and BC terminology. Experimental results showed that precision, recall, and the F1-score of positive emotional words were 98.42%, 99.73%, and 99.07%, respectively, and those of negative emotional words were 99.73%, 98.38%, and 99.05%, respectively, which all significantly outperformed the C-LIWC and HowNet.

conclusionsThe emotional lexicon with fine-grained emotional categories conforms to the characteristics of patients with BC. Its performance related to identifying and classifying domain-specific emotional words in BC is better compared to the C-LIWC and HowNet. This lexicon not only provides a new tool for sentiment analysis in the field of BC but also provides a new perspective for recognizing the specific emotional state and needs of patients with BC and formulating tailored emotional management plans.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEmotionsFearFemaleHumansSadnessSentiment Analysisbreast cancerdomain emotional lexiconlexicon constructionnatural language processingsentiment analysis

Identifiers

PMID37698914
PMCPMC10523220
OpenAlexW4386624063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.