Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37698861›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Phosphatidylethanol vs Transdermal Alcohol Monitoring for Detecting Alcohol Consumption Among Adults.

Judith A Hahn, Robin Fatch, Nancy P Barnett, Gregory M Marcus

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Judith A HahnDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Robin FatchDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Nancy P BarnettDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences and the Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Gregory M MarcusDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
University of California, San Francisco · USBrown University · US

Funding

Mechanistic Relationships Between Ethanol and Human Atrial FibrillationR01AA022222 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GREGORY M MARCUS · 2014 to 2026
$4.4M
Training in Research Program on Alcohol Use by Persons with our at Risk for HIVK24AA022586 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HAHN, JUDITH ALISSA · 2013 to 2023
$1.8M
NIAAA NIH HHS K24 AA022586
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Alcohol biomarkers can improve detection of heavy alcohol use in clinical care, yet cutoffs for phosphatidylethanol (PEth), a blood biomarker, have not been established. Objective: To determine the optimal cutoff for PEth for heavy alcohol consumption in a study of middle-age and older adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a 4-week diagnostic study of adults with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) and current alcohol consumption, recruited from general cardiology and cardiac electrophysiology outpatient clinics from September 2014 to September 2019. Data were analyzed from October 2021 to March 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main aim was to determine the optimal PEth cutoff for heavy alcohol consumption, using the Secure Continuous Remote Alcohol Monitor (SCRAM) to measure transdermal alcohol. Area under the curve (AUC) for PEth-detected compared with SCRAM-detected heavy alcohol consumption in any week over the prior 4 weeks (ie, ≥3 [women] and ≥4 [men] episodes) or any estimated breath alcohol of 0.08% or greater in any week, and the PEth cutoff was calculated using the Youden J statistic. Similar analyses were conducted comparing PEth with individual drinks reported by pressing an event monitor, retrospective self-report via the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C), and using 2-week look-backs. Results: In this diagnostic study of 64 patients with both PEth and SCRAM measures over 4 weeks (54 [84.4%] men; mean age, 65.5 [95% CI, 62.6-68.5] years; 51 [79.7%] White), 31 (48.4%) had any SCRAM-detected heavy alcohol consumption over the 4 weeks, and the median (IQR) PEth at 4 weeks was 23 ng/mL (<limit of quantification to 60 ng/mL). The AUC for PEth vs any SCRAM-detected heavy alcohol consumption was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.72-0.93). The optimal PEth cutoff was 18.5 ng/mL (AUC, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.72-0.93), with sensitivity of 83.9% (95% CI, 66.3%-94.5%) and specificity of 72.7% (95% CI, 54.5%-86.7%). The PEth test characteristics by individual drink reporting using the event monitors and by the AUDIT-C, and by these measures and by SCRAM collected for 2-week intervals, were similar to those compared with the 4-week SCRAM. Conclusions and Relevance: In a predominately middle-age and older White male population, PEth compared well with SCRAM. A PEth cutoff of 18.5 ng/mL (or rounded to 20 ng/mL, a recommended PEth cutoff for significant alcohol consumption) can be used in clinical care to detect heavy alcohol consumption in middle-age and older men.

Indexed as

AlcoholismAgedAlcohol DrinkingEthanolFemaleGlycerophospholipidsHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesEthanolGlycerophospholipidsphosphatidylethanol

Identifiers

PMID37698861
PMCPMC10498325
OpenAlexW4386624018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.