Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37698819›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2023

Current and Developing Technologies for BP Monitoring.

Deepthi Gunasekaran, Jeffrey M Turner

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 59% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Deepthi GunasekaranSection of Nephrology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Jeffrey M TurnerSection of Nephrology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. jeffrey.turner@yale.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5733-949X
Yale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo discuss new and emerging technologies for blood pressure measurement and monitoring, including the limitations of current blood pressure measurement techniques, hopes for new device technologies, and the current barriers impeding change in this space. RECENT

findingsA number of new cuffless devices are being developed and poised to emerge on the marketplace in coming years. There are several different types of technologies and sensors currently under study. New guidelines for validation of cuffless blood pressure devices have recently been developed in anticipation of this change. The current standards for blood pressure device validation are specific to cuff-based technology and are insufficient for validating devices with cuffless-based technologies. In anticipation of a number of new cuffless technologies coming to market in the coming years, three sets of standards have been developed and published in recent years to address this gap.

Indexed as

Blood Pressure DeterminationSphygmomanometersBlood PressureHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicBlood pressure validation standardsCuffless blood pressure devicesRemote blood pressure monitoring

Identifiers

PMID37698819
OpenAlexW4386623509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.