ArticleEndocrine2024
Impact of the number of intermediate risk factors on outcome of papillary thyroid cancer.
Article in Endocrine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe 2015 American Thyroid Association risk stratification system (2015-RSS) is used to assess the tumor recurrence rate and guide the initial treatment. At the current moment, patients with one or multiple intermediate risk factors (IRF) have the same treatment. This study was conducted to evaluate the impact of the number of IRF characteristics on tumor persistence or recurrence rates.
methodsPatients with intermediate risk papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) were selected and analyzed, furthermore, they were divided into two subgroups, one with 1-2 IRF and another with ≥3 IRF. Those data were analyzed in relation to response to therapy at the end of the first year and in last appointment, time to reach non evidence of disease (NED) state and time in NED state.
resultsA total of 257 patients were evaluated. Extrathyroidal invasion, vascular invasion, the total number of IRF and the subgroup of ≥3 IRF were associated with non-excellent response in last consultation; IRF lymph node metastasis was associated with non-excellent response in the first year and in last appointment and prolonged time in NED state; vascular invasion was associated with a shorter time in NED state; total number of IRF and aggressive histology were related to delay in the achievement of NED state.
conclusionsHigher number of IRF was a predictive factor of non-excellent response in the last visit and was associated with longer time to reach the NED state. Those data suggest a benefit from closer follow-up and more intensive treatment in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37698810What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.