ReviewAdvances in therapy2023
Efficacy of Biologics in Patients with Allergic Severe Asthma, Overall and by Blood Eosinophil Count: A Literature Review.
Review in Advances in therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of Depemokimab in asthma with eosinophilic phenotype: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical response and on-treatment clinical remission with tezepelumab in a broad population of patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma: results over 2 years from the NAVIGATOR and DESTINATION studies.The European respiratory journal · 2024Trial
- Beyond biomarkers: the role of clinical factors associated with biologic therapy response in severe asthma.Annals of medicine · 2026Observational
- Identification of predictive factors for clinical remission and comparison of 3 definitions in Japanese patients with severe asthma treated with biologics.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026Article
- Biologic outcomes in patients with severe asthma and clinically relevant allergy in the CHRONICLE study.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026Article
- Potential Impact of Biologic Use on Asthma-Related Hospitalization: An Epidemiological Study in Hong Kong.Canadian respiratory journal · 2026Article
- Oral Administration of Trichosanthes Kirilowii Fruit Extract Ameliorates Airway Inflammation and Suppresses Th2 Cell Activities in Ovalbumin-Sensitized Mice.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Mulberroside A ameliorates murine allergic airway inflammation by suppressing Th2 response and oxidative stress.Inflammopharmacology · 2025Article
- A Unified Pathogenesis of Allergic Diseases; The Protein-Homeostasis-System Hypothesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- NOTCH pathway was involved in Kaempferol 3-O-gentiobioside attenuated airway inflammation and mucus hypersecretion.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Impact of biologic therapy on blood cell indices and exacerbation risk in severe asthma: predictive value of the neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio.Frontiers in allergy · 2025Article
- Asthma Biologics Across the T2 Spectrum of Inflammation in Severe Asthma: Biomarkers and Mechanism of Action.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2025Review
- Sphingosine kinase 1-specific inhibitor PF543 reduces goblet cell metaplasia of bronchial epithelium in an acute asthma model.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2024Article
- Personalized Medicine in Severe Asthma: Bridging the Gaps.Open respiratory archivesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with uncontrolled, allergic severe asthma may be prescribed biologic therapies to reduce exacerbations and improve disease control. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of these therapies have differed in design, with varying results overall and by baseline blood eosinophil count (BEC). This study describes published annualized asthma exacerbation rate (AAER) reductions from RCTs in patients with allergic severe asthma, overall and by baseline BEC category. A literature search was performed to identify published phase 3 RCT data of US Food and Drug Administration-approved biologics for severe asthma in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma and confirmed sensitization to perennial aeroallergens. Analyses focused on AAER reduction versus placebo in the overall population and/or in those with an elevated or low BEC at baseline or screening. Baseline serum total immunoglobulin E levels varied between RCT populations. In patients with allergic severe asthma across all BEC categories, data were available for tezepelumab, dupilumab, benralizumab and omalizumab only; the greatest AAER reduction was observed with tezepelumab. In patients with allergic severe asthma and BECs of ≥ 260 cells/µL or ≥ 300 cells/μL, AAER reductions were observed with all biologics (tezepelumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab and omalizumab); the greatest AAER reduction was observed with tezepelumab and the smallest AAER reduction was observed with omalizumab. In patients with allergic severe asthma and BECs of < 260 cells/µL or < 300 cells/μL (regardless of historical BEC), an AAER reduction was observed with tezepelumab but not with benralizumab or omalizumab. Differential mechanisms of action may explain the differences in results observed between biologics. Among patients with allergic severe asthma, the efficacy of biologics in RCTs varied considerably overall and by BEC. Tezepelumab was the only biologic to demonstrate AAER reductions consistently across all subgroups. These differences can inform provider treatment decisions when selecting biologic treatments for patients with allergic severe asthma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.