Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37698680›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023

Development and implementation of a student tumor board as a teaching format for medical students.

Irina Mäurer, Robert Drescher, Jakob Hammersen, Nora Dieckmann, Yvonne Gremme, Max-Johann Sturm, Aaron Lawson McLean, Anna C Lawson McLean, Christian Senft, Andrea Wittig and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Shaping the future of radiation oncology education: results of a nationwide student survey from Germany.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Integrating MDT Tumor Board Shadowing into the Undergraduate Medical Curriculum: Perspective of Medical Students.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024
    Article
  9. Knowledge and competences in hematological malignancies amongst radiation oncology residents in Germany-results from a national survey.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Successful implementation of online educational lectures of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO).Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Irina MäurerDepartment of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Robert DrescherDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Jakob HammersenDepartment for Haematology and Medical Oncology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Nora DieckmannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Jena, Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Yvonne GremmeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Jena, Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Max-Johann SturmDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Jena, Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Aaron Lawson McLeanNeuro-Oncological Center, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Anna C Lawson McLeanNeuro-Oncological Center, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Christian SenftNeuro-Oncological Center, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Andrea WittigNeuro-Oncological Center, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Caroline KlingnerDepartment of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Christiane von SassNeuro-Oncological Center, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Matthias Mäurer *Neuro-Oncological Center, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany. Matthias.maeurer@med.uni-jena.de.
Marcel A Kamp *Neuro-Oncological Center, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Friedrich Schiller University Jena · DEJena University Hospital · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft funding number 413668513Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung AntiAge
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTumor boards serve as established platforms for interdisciplinary expert discussions and therapeutic recommendations tailored to individual patient characteristics. Despite their significance, medical students often lack exposure to such interdisciplinary discussions as tumor boards are currently not integrated into medical curricula. To address this, we aimed to enhance future physicians' interdisciplinary communication skills and subject-specific knowledge by introducing an interactive series of five linked tumor board seminars within the domain of neuro-oncology.

methodsWe developed a neuro-oncological student tumor board using a flipped-classroom format. The primary objectives of this case-centered approach included fostering an understanding of the tumor board process, active participation in multidisciplinary case discussions, honing appropriate communication strategies, and creating personalized therapy plans that consider inputs from all relevant disciplines, individual patient factors, and ethical considerations. To gauge the effectiveness of the seminar series, we administered structured pre- and post-course questionnaires.

resultsFourteen medical students in third to fifth year participated in the pilot series. Despite its organizational complexity, the interdisciplinary seminars were feasible. Students demonstrated significant growth in competence, aligned with predefined learning objectives. Notably, they appreciated the supportive learning environment and interactive teaching format, which kindled their interest in interdisciplinary oncology.

conclusionActive participation in a student tumor board can empower students to tackle the diverse challenges of caring for cancer patients within an interdisciplinary team during the early stages of their careers. The student tumor board represents an innovative, learner-centered approach to teach interdisciplinary cancer treatment, communication strategies, and ethical aspects of medical practice.

Indexed as

Students, MedicalCurriculumHumansLearningFlipped classroomMedical educationNeuro-oncologyTeaching formatTumor board

Identifiers

PMID37698680
PMCPMC10620267
OpenAlexW4386623702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.