ArticleInternational ophthalmology2023
Comparison of the efficacy of two different glucocorticoid regimens for treatment of active moderate-to-severe Graves' orbitopathy.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05793359 (Comparison of the Efficacy of Two Different Glucocorticoid Regimens for Treatment of Active Moderate-to-severe Graves' Orbitopathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of the Efficacy of Two Different Glucocorticoid Regimens for Treatment of Active Moderate-to-severe Graves' Orbitopathy
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacologic Therapies for Active Moderate-to-Severe TED: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.Clinical medicine insights. Endocrinology and diabetes · 2026Review
- Evaluation of disease-specific quality of life and its influencing factors in Bulgarian patients with Graves' orbitopathy.International ophthalmology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIntravenous glucocorticoids (GCs) are the mainstay of treatment for severe forms of Graves' orbitopathy (GO). Our aim was to assess the effectiveness and safety of a modified monthly regimen (mMR) and to compare them with those of the established weekly regimen (WR).
methodsThis was a prospective non-randomized single-center study involving 62 patients, divided into two therapeutic groups depending on their referral time. Thirty-one subjects, admitted in the period 2017-2018, were treated with mMR, total dose-5.5 g, with intake of oral GCs after completion of intravenous infusions. Thirty subjects, who were referred in the period 2019-2020, were treated with WR, total dose-4.5 g One patient refused to be part of the WR group and was treated with mMR. Eye status and therapeutic response were evaluated on the 1st, 3rd and 6th months, quality of life-at 3rd and 6th month.
resultsAt 1st month and 3rd month, there was no significant difference in the therapeutic response between the two groups. At 3rd month, the proportion of patients with improvement in soft tissue manifestations and subjective complaints was significantly higher in mMR group (65.6% vs. 40% and 81.3% vs. 46.7%, respectively) and the same manifestations were of significantly milder degree. At 3rd month, significant improvement in quality of life was found without significant difference between the two groups. At 6th month, worsening of GO occurred in 3 patients from WR group, while in 5 patients from mMR group further improvement was found.
conclusionsThe two GC regimens have comparable efficacy with small differences in the time of onset of the effect and its duration, as well as in the effectiveness on some ocular manifestations. Trial registration number NCT05793359/29.03.2023, retrospectively registered..
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.