ReviewUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023
[Intervention planning in modern renal surgery].
Review in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThree-dimensional (3D) reconstruction in renal surgery offers significant benefits in planning of the operation itself, in patient education and training fellows.
objectiveThe goal was to study the possible application and use of 3D reconstruction in modern renal surgery.
methodsA literature search in PubMed using keywords "3D" and "renal surgery" within the last 10 years of publication was performed.
resultsThe search revealed 655 articles among them 53 reviews. Relevant for this article were 120 articles which included 14 reviews. The publication statistics showed a strong increase in the last 10 years which may reflect the increasing application and demand for 3D technology in the field of renal surgery. Especially in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery applications, the use of 3D technology was studied more often. The technical standards are not yet uniform and 3D printing in complex renal surgery remains cost- and time-intensive. Nevertheless, the results of the pioneering clinical studies showed positive results, and 3D technology can be used not only in planning the operation, but in patient education and also the training of fellows and staff. A limitation to more complex cases seems to be sensible for this is still a costly tool. To identify complex cases in renal surgery, the established renometric scoring systems should be used more broadly in daily practice to identify patients who would profit most from this technique.
conclusionIn complex renal surgery, 3D reconstruction and modelling is rational; furthermore, it can be useful in patient education and in training of fellows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37698657What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.