ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2023
Direct comparison and reproducibility of two segmentation methods for multicompartment dosimetry: round robin study on radioembolization treatment planning in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03295006 (A TheraSphere® Advanced Dosimetry Retrospective Global Study Evaluation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A TheraSphere® Advanced Dosimetry Retrospective Global Study Evaluation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel approach to radioembolization treatment planning using a hybrid [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Predictive value of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Utility of pre-procedural [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Observational
- Accuracy of holmium-166 SPECT/CT quantification over a large range of activities.EJNMMI physics · 2024Article
- Prediction of [EJNMMI physics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeInvestigate reproducibility of two segmentation methods for multicompartment dosimetry, including normal tissue absorbed dose (NTAD) and tumour absorbed dose (TAD), in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with yttrium-90 (
methodsTARGET was a retrospective investigation in 209 patients with < 10 tumours per lobe and at least one tumour ≥ 3 cm ± portal vein thrombosis. Dosimetry was compared using two distinct segmentation methods: anatomic (CT/MRI-based) and count threshold-based on pre-procedural
results
conclusionAnatomic segmentation-based dosimetry, versus
trial registrationNCT03295006.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.