ArticleSkeletal radiology2024
Automatic MRI-based rotator cuff muscle segmentation using U-Nets.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hierarchical Multimodal Fusion of Multi-Sequence MRI and Clinical Metadata for the Classification of Rotator Cuff Tears.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- AI-navigated shoulder injection: precision, real-time learning and clinical translation.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- Advances in Shoulder Pain Imaging: A Narrative Review of Current Practice and Emerging Trends.Current medical imaging · 2025Article
- Navigating diagnostic dilemmas: Localizing parathyroid adenoma in the presence of MIBI-avid thyroid nodules: A case report and literature review.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- Quantitative assessment of rotator cuff injuries using synthetic MRI and IDEAL-IQ imaging techniques.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Efficient musculoskeletal annotation using free-form deformation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe rotator cuff (RC) is a crucial anatomical element within the shoulder joint, facilitating an extensive array of motions while maintaining joint stability. Comprised of the subscapularis, infraspinatus, supraspinatus, and teres minor muscles, the RC plays an integral role in shoulder functionality. RC injuries represent prevalent, incapacitating conditions that impose a substantial impact on approximately 8% of the adult population in the USA. Segmentation of these muscles provides valuable anatomical information for evaluating muscle quality and allows for better treatment planning. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe developed a model based on residual deep convolutional encoder-decoder U-net to segment RC muscles on oblique sagittal T1-weighted images MRI. Our data consisted of shoulder MRIs from a cohort of 157 individuals, consisting of individuals without RC tendon tear (N=79) and patients with partial RC tendon tear (N=78). We evaluated different modeling approaches. The performance of the models was evaluated by calculating the Dice coefficient on the hold out test set.
resultsThe best-performing model's median Dice coefficient was measured to be 89% (Q1:85%, Q3:96%) for the supraspinatus, 86% (Q1:82%, Q3:88%) for the subscapularis, 86% (Q1:82%, Q3:90%) for the infraspinatus, and 78% (Q1:70%, Q3:81%) for the teres minor muscle, indicating a satisfactory level of accuracy in the model's predictions.
conclusionOur computational models demonstrated the capability to delineate RC muscles with a level of precision akin to that of experienced radiologists. As hypothesized, the proposed algorithm exhibited superior performance when segmenting muscles with well-defined boundaries, including the supraspinatus, subscapularis, and infraspinatus muscles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.