Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37698626›Full record

ArticleSkeletal radiology2024

Automatic MRI-based rotator cuff muscle segmentation using U-Nets.

Ehsan Alipour, Majid Chalian, Atefe Pooyan, Arash Azhideh, Firoozeh Shomal Zadeh, Hesamoddin Jahanian

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ehsan AlipourDepartment of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, University of Washington, UW Radiology-Roosevelt Clinic, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Box, Seattle, WA, 354755, USA.
Majid ChalianDepartment of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, University of Washington, UW Radiology-Roosevelt Clinic, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Box, Seattle, WA, 354755, USA. mchalian@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8400-1593
Atefe PooyanDepartment of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, University of Washington, UW Radiology-Roosevelt Clinic, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Box, Seattle, WA, 354755, USA.
Arash AzhidehDepartment of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, University of Washington, UW Radiology-Roosevelt Clinic, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Box, Seattle, WA, 354755, USA.
Firoozeh Shomal ZadehDepartment of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, University of Washington, UW Radiology-Roosevelt Clinic, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Box, Seattle, WA, 354755, USA.
Hesamoddin JahanianDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington · USRoosevelt University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rotator cuff (RC) is a crucial anatomical element within the shoulder joint, facilitating an extensive array of motions while maintaining joint stability. Comprised of the subscapularis, infraspinatus, supraspinatus, and teres minor muscles, the RC plays an integral role in shoulder functionality. RC injuries represent prevalent, incapacitating conditions that impose a substantial impact on approximately 8% of the adult population in the USA. Segmentation of these muscles provides valuable anatomical information for evaluating muscle quality and allows for better treatment planning. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe developed a model based on residual deep convolutional encoder-decoder U-net to segment RC muscles on oblique sagittal T1-weighted images MRI. Our data consisted of shoulder MRIs from a cohort of 157 individuals, consisting of individuals without RC tendon tear (N=79) and patients with partial RC tendon tear (N=78). We evaluated different modeling approaches. The performance of the models was evaluated by calculating the Dice coefficient on the hold out test set.

resultsThe best-performing model's median Dice coefficient was measured to be 89% (Q1:85%, Q3:96%) for the supraspinatus, 86% (Q1:82%, Q3:88%) for the subscapularis, 86% (Q1:82%, Q3:90%) for the infraspinatus, and 78% (Q1:70%, Q3:81%) for the teres minor muscle, indicating a satisfactory level of accuracy in the model's predictions.

conclusionOur computational models demonstrated the capability to delineate RC muscles with a level of precision akin to that of experienced radiologists. As hypothesized, the proposed algorithm exhibited superior performance when segmenting muscles with well-defined boundaries, including the supraspinatus, subscapularis, and infraspinatus muscles.

Indexed as

Rotator Cuff InjuriesShoulder JointAdultHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRotator CuffShoulderArtificial intelligenceResidual U-NetSegmentationShoulder rotator cuff

Identifiers

PMID37698626
OpenAlexW4386624002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.