Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37698618›Full record

Trial reportClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2023

Physical exercise as a treatment for persisting symptoms post-COVID infection: review of ongoing studies and prospective randomized controlled training study.

Alexander Kogel, Moritz Machatschek, Ronja Scharschmidt, Carolin Wollny, Florian Lordick, Mohamed Ghanem, Ulrich Laufs, Sven Fikenzer

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander Kogel *Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1842-4480
Moritz Machatschek *Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Ronja ScharschmidtZentrale Einrichtung für Physikalische Therapie und Rehabilitation, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Carolin WollnyZentrale Einrichtung für Physikalische Therapie und Rehabilitation, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Florian LordickMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik 2-Onkologie, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Pneumologie, Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Mohamed GhanemZentrale Einrichtung für Physikalische Therapie und Rehabilitation, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1724-336X
Ulrich Laufs *Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2620-9323
Sven Fikenzer *Klinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. sven.fikenzer@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9713-9401
University Hospital Leipzig · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 493646873 - MD-LEICS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeNo evidence-based treatment is available for patients with persisting symptoms post-COVID-19 infection. We hypothesized that physical exercise may represent a safe and effective treatment option for post-COVID.

methodsWe performed a systematic search of the literature that revealed a lack of randomized training studies in patients post-COVID. Based on these findings, a prospective randomized controlled study with open-label and blinded endpoint evaluation was designed. 272 patients with symptoms of fatigue persisting over 6 weeks post-COVID infection were screened. Patients with pathological cardiovascular findings were excluded. 57 patients consented and were randomized to 4 weeks of supervised personalized strength and endurance training or usual care. The follow-up period was 3 and 6 months.

resultsThere were no adverse events related to the training. Spiroergometry of the training group showed a significantly higher increase in VO2peak (10.0 ± 12.7% vs. 0.1 ± 8.9%, p < 0.01, respectively) and oxygen pulse (9.8 ± 10.8% vs. 0.0 ± 13.9%, p < 0.05, respectively). Parameters of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20, McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire, and Post-COVID-19 Functional Status were improved after 4 weeks in both groups. In the follow-up period, the total physical activity per week was significantly greater in the exercise group than in controls (1280 ± 1192 min vs. 644 ± 554 min, p < 0.05, respectively). The improvements in fatigue and quality of life were not statistically different between the training and usual care groups.

conclusionExercise is safe and improves maximal exercise capacity in post-COVID patients. Fatigue and quality of life improve over time in individuals that are willing to participate in a training study irrespective of their allocation. REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00026686. Date of registration: 27.09.2021.

Indexed as

COVID-19Quality of LifeExerciseFatigueHumansProspective StudiesCOVID-19ExerciseFatiguePost-COVIDTraining

Identifiers

PMID37698618
PMCPMC10584711
OpenAlexW4386624721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.