ArticleJAMA2023
Intracerebral Hemorrhage Among Blood Donors and Their Transfusion Recipients.
Article in JAMA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Embracing complexity in transfusion research.Vox sanguinis · 2026Review
- The Influence of Older Age on RBC Transfusion Decisions in ICU Patients.Critical care medicine · 2026Observational
- The long road back to the start: a return to prothrombin complex concentrate.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
- Physiological determinants and the red blood cells transfusion decision-making process in non-bleeding critically ill patients: a comprehensive narrative review.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- The future of transfusion and transplant microbiology safety: can new molecular technologies improve the safety of blood and transplant?BMC infectious diseases · 2026Review
- Modelling human proteostasis and organelle homeostasis disorders in yeast and its application in drug discovery.FEMS yeast research · 2026Review
- Amyloid-β Seeds in Alzheimer's Disease: Research Challenges and Implications.Journal of neurochemistry · 2025Review
- Ethical considerations of disclosure of iatrogenic cerebral amyloid angiopathy.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Clinical Management of Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Iatrogenic Dementia: Providing Insight into Transmissible Subtype of Alzheimer's Disease, Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease and Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Anti-Prion Systems in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Journal of neurochemistry · 2025Review
- Iatrogenic Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy in Patients Treated With Cadaveric Dura Mater During Childhood Neurosurgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Could Blood Transfusion Increase the Risk of Alzheimer's Disease? A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Iatrogenic cerebral amyloid angiopathy: more cases to come.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Iatrogenic cerebral proteinopathies-The dawn of transmissible neurodegeneration? The example of cerebral amyloid angiopathy.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Atypical presentation of cerebral amyloid angiopathy in a 42-year-old man with recurrent lobar hemorrhages and neuropsychiatric symptoms.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
- Iatrogenic cerebral amyloid angiopathy after red blood cell transfusion?European journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Modelling hepatitis C infection acquired from blood transfusions in the UK between 1970 and 1991 for the Infected Blood Inquiry.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Cerebral amyloid angiopathy decades after red blood cell transfusions: a report of two cases from a prospective cohort.European journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Acquired cerebral amyloid angiopathy: more questions than answers.European journal of neurology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Recent reports have suggested that cerebral amyloid angiopathy, a common cause of multiple spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhages (ICHs), may be transmissible through parenteral injection of contaminated cadaveric pituitary hormone in humans. Objective: To determine whether spontaneous ICH in blood donors after blood donation is associated with development of spontaneous ICH in transfusion recipients. Design, Setting, and Participants: Exploratory retrospective cohort study using nationwide blood bank and health register data from Sweden (main cohort) and Denmark (validation cohort) and including all 1 089 370 patients aged 5 to 80 years recorded to have received a red blood cell transfusion from January 1, 1970 (Sweden), or January 1, 1980 (Denmark), until December 31, 2017. Exposures: Receipt of red blood cell transfusions from blood donors who subsequently developed (1) a single spontaneous ICH, (2) multiple spontaneous ICHs, or (3) no spontaneous ICH. Main Outcomes and Measures: Spontaneous ICH in transfusion recipients; ischemic stroke was a negative control outcome. Results: A total of 759 858 patients from Sweden (median age, 65 [IQR, 48-73] years; 59% female) and 329 512 from Denmark (median age, 64 [IQR, 50-73] years; 58% female) were included, with a median follow-up of 5.8 (IQR, 1.4-12.5) years and 6.1 (IQR, 1.5-11.6) years, respectively. Patients who underwent transfusion with red blood cell units from donors who developed multiple spontaneous ICHs had a significantly higher risk of a single spontaneous ICH themselves, compared with patients receiving transfusions from donors who did not develop spontaneous ICH, in both the Swedish cohort (unadjusted incidence rate [IR], 3.16 vs 1.12 per 1000 person-years; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.73; 95% CI, 1.72-4.35; P < .001) and the Danish cohort (unadjusted IR, 2.82 vs 1.09 per 1000 person-years; adjusted HR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.04-5.19; P = .04). No significant difference was found for patients receiving transfusions from donors who developed a single spontaneous ICH in the Swedish cohort (unadjusted IR, 1.35 vs 1.12 per 1000 person-years; adjusted HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.84-1.36; P = .62) nor the Danish cohort (unadjusted IR, 1.36 vs 1.09 per 1000 person-years; adjusted HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.70-1.60; P = .73), nor for ischemic stroke as a negative control outcome. Conclusions and Relevance: In an exploratory analysis of patients who received red blood cell transfusions, patients who underwent transfusion with red blood cells from donors who later developed multiple spontaneous ICHs were at significantly increased risk of spontaneous ICH themselves. This may suggest a transfusion-transmissible agent associated with some types of spontaneous ICH, although the findings may be susceptible to selection bias and residual confounding, and further research is needed to investigate if transfusion transmission of cerebral amyloid angiopathy might explain this association.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.