ArticleJournal of analytical toxicology2023
Interpretative problems due to the presence of chloromethcathinone isomers in the biological material from postmortem cases.
Article in Journal of analytical toxicology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interpol review of forensic toxicology, 2023-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026Review
- Prevalence and toxicological significance of 3-CMC and 4-CMC: A Retrospective study of over 250 forensic cases (2015-2025).International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- 4-Bromomethcathinone (4-BMC) Revisited: The First Reported Fatal Case and Toxicological Insights.Metabolites · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparative analysis of post-mortem drug concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid and blood.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While many new psychoactive substances often disappear from the drug market rather quickly, some, such as synthetic cathinones (SCs), still remain due to their popularity among users. The current knowledge of SC concentrations in blood samples is based mainly on the published case reports of intoxications or fatalities caused by SC intake. The aim of the present study was to present and interpret the obtained toxicological analysis results of these cases, in which it was possible to determine or detect the presence of one of the isomers of chloromethcathinone (CMC) along with its intake biomarker-dihydro-CMC. These cases include 27 deaths reported at the Department of Forensic Medicine in Kraków in 2016-2022. CMC constitutes a major toxicological opinion challenge, in terms of toxicological evaluation of poisonings. As presented in this paper, a significant problem is its stability in the biological material and practices in the reporting of the obtained data. It is therefore important to monitor potential intake biomarkers that may show greater stability in the biological material than the parent drug. In the case of CMC isomers, the good biomarker of intake is the dihydro-CMC metabolite, which was detected in the blood sample in every case presented, even with the absence of the parent substance. Interpretation of the results obtained for CMC in terms of assessing their toxicity and possible cause of death is difficult. However, it should be taken into account that in cases of new psychoactive substance poisoning, an in-depth risk assessment is mandatory and the opinion of the unpredictability of the effects is taken as a principle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.