ArticleThe Laryngoscope2024
Longitudinal Performance of Cochlear Implants in Neurofibromatosis Type 2.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveCochlear implants (CIs) are a well-established treatment modality for hearing loss due to neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2). Our aim is to investigate variables that affect longitudinal performance of CIs among patients with NF2. STUDY
designRetrospective review at a single academic institution consisting of patients who have received cochlear implants following hearing loss due to NF2.
methodsThe primary outcome examined was CI disuse or explantation. Associated clinical and surgical variables were analyzed using descriptive statistics. These included postoperative pure tone average (PTA) at 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz, tumor size, previous surgery, and comorbid depression.
resultsA total of 12 patients and 14 cochlear implants received at our institution from 2001 to 2022 were included. Notably, 35.7% of CIs (5 out of 14 cases) resulted in disuse or explantation. The average interval until explant was 9.4 years (range 3-14 years). In explanted CI cases, 20% had previous surgery and 80% had a diagnosis of comorbid depression as compared to 22.2% and 22.2%, respectively, in intact CI cases. Maximum tumor diameter was the only variable found to impact CI usage outcome (p = 0.028). Long-term data showed that on average, patients benefit from 13.85 years of CI utility and a maximum PTA improvement of 45.0 ± 29.0 dB.
conclusionDespite the recurrent nature of NF2, patients continue to receive audiological benefit from cochlear implants. We found that larger tumor size may be associated with longitudinal CI failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:1847-1853, 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.