Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37698177›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2023

Symptoms of complex pelvic pain: A survey in three cohorts of women.

Cecilie Therese Hagemann, Siri Spetalen, Susan Saga, Ingvild Bratlie, Vilde Dons, Signe Nilssen Stafne

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Symptoms of complex pelvic pain: A survey in three cohorts of women.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cecilie Therese HagemannDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9565-5824
Siri SpetalenFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Susan SagaDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0094-1102
Ingvild BratlieFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Vilde DonsFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Signe Nilssen StafneDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4922-477X
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere has been increased interest in addressing chronic pelvic pain and its complexity in women. The often multifactorial etiology of chronic pelvic pain and its heterogeneous presentation, however, make the condition challenging to manage. Overlap with other pain-related conditions is frequently reported, and chronic pelvic pain may impact sexual function. Nevertheless, little is known about the symptom burden of chronic pelvic pain and more complex pelvic pain in different groups of women. Thus, the aim of our study was to use a newly validated Norwegian version of the Amsterdam Complex Pelvic Pain Symptom Scale (ACPPS) to describe and compare the symptom severity of complex pelvic pain in three cohorts of women and to assess associations between demographic and gynecological characteristics and the severity of the condition. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn our cross-sectional study, we collected self-reported data from patients referred to gynecological outpatient clinics, members of vulvodynia or endometriosis patient associations, and healthy volunteers. The 397 participants (47% response rate) completed an online survey about their demographic and gynecological characteristics and symptoms related to complex pelvic pain, including the Norwegian ACPPS. Score means on questionnaires, with standard deviations and 95% confidence intervals, were recorded. We used Pearson's chi-square test, Analysis of variance and multivariable linear regression were used to assess associations of demographic and gynecological characteristics with ACPPS scores.

resultsMembers of the patient associations had significantly higher self-reported symptom burden than patients and volunteers. Symptom burden was lower among older and postmenopausal women, and unemployed women scored higher than employed ones. Especially high scores on the ACPPS were found among women with complaints of chronic pelvic pain, at least moderate pelvic pain intensity, and/or chronic vulvar pain. Women who had experienced sexual assault and/or reported low sexual function also reported high scores. In multivariable regression, fibromyalgia, low mental health and past sexual assault were found to be associated with high scores on the ACPPS.

conclusionMany women in our study reported complex pelvic pain, and overlap with other pain-related conditions, low mental health and past sexual assault was associated with high symptom burden. Those findings support taking a biopsychosocial approach to treating women who present with such complaints.

Indexed as

Chronic PainSex OffensesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPelvic PainSurveys and QuestionnairesAmsterdam complex pelvic pain symptom scalechronic pelvic painchronic vulvar painhyperactive pelvic floorpatient-reported outcomesexual assaultsexual dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID37698177
PMCPMC10540926
OpenAlexW4386623821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.