Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37698096›Full record

ReviewActa otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale2023

Management of recurrent cerebrospinal fluid leak, current practices and open challenges. A systematic literature review.

Paolo Castelnuovo, Marco Valentini, Giorgio Sileo, Paolo Battaglia, Maurizio Bignami, Mario Turri-Zanoni

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paolo CastelnuovoUnit of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnologies and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.
Marco ValentiniUnit of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnologies and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.
Giorgio SileoUnit of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnologies and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.
Paolo BattagliaUnit of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnologies and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.
Maurizio BignamiHead and Neck Surgery & Forensic Dissection Research center (HNS&FDRc), Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Mario Turri-ZanoniUnit of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnologies and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

cerebrospinal fluid leak recurrenceendoscopic endonasal surgeryhead injuryidiopathic intracranial hypertensionlumbar drainmeningocelepneumocephalusskull base

Identifiers

PMID37698096
PMCPMC10159643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.