Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37697816›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of manual & manipulative therapy2024

Identifying priority gaps in contextual factors research and force-based manipulation. An international and interdisciplinary Delphi study.

David Griswold, Ken Learman, Giacomo Rossettini, Alvisa Palese, Edmund Ickert, Mark Wilhelm, Chad Cook, Jennifer Bent

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David GriswoldDepartment of Graduate Studies in Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5597-5572
Ken LearmanDepartment of Graduate Studies in Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, OH, USA.
Giacomo RossettiniSchool of Physiotherapy, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Alvisa PaleseDepartment of Medical Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Edmund IckertDepartment of Graduate Studies in Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, OH, USA.
Mark WilhelmSchool of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Chad CookDepartment of Orthopaedics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Jennifer BentDepartment of Rehabilitation, Duke University Hospital System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Force-Based Manipulations Research NetworkU24AT011969 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Chad Cook, William Ray Reed · 2022 to 2026
$2.6M
NCCIH NIH HHS U24 AT011969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo establish priority gaps related to contextual factors (CFs) research and force-based manipulation (FBM).

methodsA three-round Delphi following recommended guidelines for conducting and reporting Delphi studies (CREDES) involving international and interdisciplinary panelists with expertise in CFs and FBM. Round 1 was structured around two prompting questions created by the workgroup. Ranking of each priority gap was done by calculating composite scores for each theme generated. Consensus threshold was set with an agreement ≥75% among panelists. Median and interquartile range were calculated for each priority gap to provide the central tendency of responses. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to evaluate the consistency and stability of responses between rounds 2 and 3.

resultsForty-six panelists participated in all three rounds of the Delphi. Consensus was reached for 16 of 19 generated themes for priority gaps in CFs research and FBM. The ranking of each identified gap was computed and presented. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was non-significant (

conclusionThe result of this Delphi provides international and interdisciplinary consensus-based priority gaps in CFs research and FBM. The gaps identified can be used to generate future research inquiries involving CFs research and FBM.

Indexed as

Delphi TechniqueConsensusContextual factorsDelphi studyforce-based manipulationmanual therapyoutcomespriority gaps

Identifiers

PMID37697816
PMCPMC10795597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.