Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37697723›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2026

Smaller diameter sheaths are required to safely perform transradial neurointerventions.

Yoshiki Hanaoka, Jun-Ichi Koyama, Takuya Nakamura, Satoshi Kitamura, Daishiro Abe, Daisuke Yamazaki, Yuki Inomata, Tetsuyoshi Horiuchi

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yoshiki HanaokaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9288-1612
Jun-Ichi KoyamaNeuroendovascular Therapy Center, Shinshu University Hospital, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan.
Takuya NakamuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0483-6561
Satoshi KitamuraNeuroendovascular Therapy Center, Shinshu University Hospital, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan.
Daishiro AbeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan.
Daisuke YamazakiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan.
Yuki InomataDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan.
Tetsuyoshi HoriuchiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5620-510X
Shinshu University · JPShinshu University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We read with great interest the paper titled "Transradial access with Simmons guiding catheter for carotid artery stenting: Feasibility and procedural complications in a single-center experience" by Muszynski et al. The authors concluded that a transradial carotid artery stenting (CAS) using a Glidesheath Slender 7F Introducer/7F Envoy Simmons 2 catheter system was feasible with a high procedural success rate and low access site complication rate. We completely agree with their conclusions. In this study, large-diameter sheaths were used. Large sheaths increase the risk of developing radial artery spasms. Interventionalists must be aware that radial artery spasm can not only require an access crossover, but can also cause severe access site complications, such as eversion or avulsion of the radial artery, catheter/sheath entrapment, and compartment syndrome. A 6F Simmons guiding sheath has a smaller outer diameter than the Glidesheath Slender 7F Introducer does, and it offers a large-bore working channel compatible with a 10-mm diameter Wallstent and Acculink. Transradial CAS with a 6F Simmons guiding sheath has previously yielded a high procedural success rate without serious access site complications. Nevertheless, we believe that a further decrease in the sheath diameter is required to safely perform transradial neurointerventions in more patients.

Indexed as

Radial ArteryStentsEquipment DesignHumansAccess site complicationsheathless approachtransradial access

Identifiers

PMID37697723
PMCPMC13294570
OpenAlexW4386624597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.