Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37697417›Full record

ReviewStem cell research & therapy2023

What is the optimal dose of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells treatment for knee osteoarthritis? A conventional and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Zongyuan Huang, Shuai Zhang, Mingde Cao, Zhujian Lin, Ling Kong, Xin Wu, Qianshi Guo, Yuxiang Ouyang, Yancheng Song

Abstract readReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell research & therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zongyuan HuangDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, No. 19 Nonglinxia Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China. 424198470@qq.com.
Shuai ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, No. 19 Nonglinxia Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Mingde CaoDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Zhujian LinDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, No. 19 Nonglinxia Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Ling KongGuangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory, Guangzhou, China.
Xin WuDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, No. 19 Nonglinxia Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Qianshi GuoDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, No. 19 Nonglinxia Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Yuxiang OuyangDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, No. 19 Nonglinxia Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Yancheng SongDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, No. 19 Nonglinxia Road, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China. hzyuan0626@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite increasing clinical investigations underscoring the efficacy and safety of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSCs) therapy in knee osteoarthritis (KOA), no article has recently reviewed the cell dosage. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of varying doses of AD-MSCs in treating KOA using conventional and network meta-analysis.

methodsA search of databases in in Chinese and English was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) on MSCs for knee osteoarthritis from the inception date to May 1, 2022. This study mainly analyzed the efficacy of AD-MSCs in the treatment of KOA, and subgroup analysis was performed on the therapeutic effects of MSCs from different tissues at the same dose. We divided the different cell doses into low, moderate, and high groups, with the corresponding cell doses: (0-25)*10^6, (25-50)*10^6, and > 50*10^6 cells, respectively. We further analyzed the improvement of improvement of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores and the incidence of adverse events (AEs) after varied dosage injection.

resultsA total of 16 literatures were included in this study, of which 8 literatures were about AD-MSCs. Conventional meta-analysis suggests that AD-MSCs can reduce pain and improve function in KOA patients, regardless of the cell doses, up to 12 months of follow-up. The network meta-analysis showed that intra-articular injection of AD-MSCs significantly improved pain and knee function scores in KOA patients compared with the control group at 3, 6, and 12 months. Among the three groups, the high-dose group had the best treatment effect, and the degree of joint pain and dysfunction indicators improved more significantly in the early stage. For adverse events, there was a dose-response trend that increased with increasing doses.

conclusionsBoth cell doses reduced pain and improved knee function in KOA patients. The effect surpassed in the high-dose group than in the moderate-dose, low-dose and control groups. However, adverse events also increase with the increase in dose, which should be carefully considered in clinical application, and the side effects still need to be paid attention to. Considering the limitations of this meta-analysis, future studies need to further explore the efficacy and safety of different doses of treatment, and carry out large sample, multi-center, randomized controlled trials to ensure the reliability and promotion value of the research results.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem CellsOsteoarthritis, KneeHumansKnee JointRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCell dosesKnee osteoarthritisMesenchymal stem cellsMeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID37697417
PMCPMC10496179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.