ReviewStem cell research & therapy2023
What is the optimal dose of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells treatment for knee osteoarthritis? A conventional and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Review in Stem cell research & therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Efficacy based on dose-response and safety of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of single versus repeated injections of mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cells in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Pooled it
- Dose-response relationship of MSCs as living Bio-drugs in HFrEF patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Intra-articular allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cell injections for stage III knee osteoarthritis: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial with 60-month follow-up.Stem cells translational medicine · 2026Trial
- Mesenchymal stromal cells therapy for remodeling the joint microenvironment: mechanisms, nanotechnology-enhanced strategies, and translation prospects.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Review
- Adipose-Derived Stromal Cells for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Study of Clinical Outcomes and Predictive Factors.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Current challenges and future directions of ATMPs in regenerative medicine.Regenerative therapy · 2025Review
- Precision medicine in premature ovarian insufficiency: a focus on the precision therapeutic strategies for mesenchymal stem cells.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Review
- Cathepsin K Inhibitors as Potential Drugs for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Adipose-derived stem cells and knee osteoarthritis: New perspectives, old concerns.World journal of orthopedics · 2024Article
- Influencing factors analysis of asymmetry in knee adduction moment among patients with unilateral knee osteoarthritis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis of Short-Term and Long-Term Clinical Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Different Sources in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis.Stem cells international · 2024Review
- Platelet Concentrates Preconditioning of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Combined Therapies: Integrating Regenerative Strategies for Enhanced Clinical Applications.Cell transplantationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite increasing clinical investigations underscoring the efficacy and safety of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSCs) therapy in knee osteoarthritis (KOA), no article has recently reviewed the cell dosage. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of varying doses of AD-MSCs in treating KOA using conventional and network meta-analysis.
methodsA search of databases in in Chinese and English was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) on MSCs for knee osteoarthritis from the inception date to May 1, 2022. This study mainly analyzed the efficacy of AD-MSCs in the treatment of KOA, and subgroup analysis was performed on the therapeutic effects of MSCs from different tissues at the same dose. We divided the different cell doses into low, moderate, and high groups, with the corresponding cell doses: (0-25)*10^6, (25-50)*10^6, and > 50*10^6 cells, respectively. We further analyzed the improvement of improvement of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores and the incidence of adverse events (AEs) after varied dosage injection.
resultsA total of 16 literatures were included in this study, of which 8 literatures were about AD-MSCs. Conventional meta-analysis suggests that AD-MSCs can reduce pain and improve function in KOA patients, regardless of the cell doses, up to 12 months of follow-up. The network meta-analysis showed that intra-articular injection of AD-MSCs significantly improved pain and knee function scores in KOA patients compared with the control group at 3, 6, and 12 months. Among the three groups, the high-dose group had the best treatment effect, and the degree of joint pain and dysfunction indicators improved more significantly in the early stage. For adverse events, there was a dose-response trend that increased with increasing doses.
conclusionsBoth cell doses reduced pain and improved knee function in KOA patients. The effect surpassed in the high-dose group than in the moderate-dose, low-dose and control groups. However, adverse events also increase with the increase in dose, which should be carefully considered in clinical application, and the side effects still need to be paid attention to. Considering the limitations of this meta-analysis, future studies need to further explore the efficacy and safety of different doses of treatment, and carry out large sample, multi-center, randomized controlled trials to ensure the reliability and promotion value of the research results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.