ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2023
Quantitative analysis of vertebral fat fraction and R2
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive Effect of Preoperative Bone Marrow Fat Fraction on Postoperative Bone Mineral Density After Bariatric Surgery: a Prospective Cohort Study.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the severity of lumbar osteoporosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using q-Dixon magnetic resonance imaging.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Musculoskeletal manifestations of sickle cell disease: an imaging perspective.Skeletal radiology · 2025Review
- Preliminary quantitative analysis of renal sinus fat dysfunction in T2DM patients using MRI fat fraction and R2* mapping.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the correlation between FF, R2* value of IDEAL-IQ sequence and bone mineral density, and to explore their application value in the osteoporosis.
methodsWe recruited 105 women and 69 men aged over 30 years who voluntarily underwent DXA and MRI examination of lumbar spine at the same day. Participants were divided into normal, osteopenia and osteoporosis group based on T-score and BMD value of DXA examination. One-way ANOVA was adopted to compare the quantitative parameters among the three groups. Independent samples t-test was utilized to compare FF and R2* value between men and women.Pearson correlation analysis was used to research the correlation between FF, R2* value and BMD.
resultsAge, height, weight, BMD and FF value were significantly different among three groups (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found in FF value between male and female group, while R2* value were significantly different. Vertebral FF was moderately negatively correlated with aBMD, especially in women (r = -0.638, p < 0.001). R2* was mildly to moderately positively correlated with aBMD in men (r = 0.350, p = 0.003), but not in women. Moreover, FF was positively correlated with age, R2* was negatively correlated with age in men, and BMD was negatively correlated with age.
conclusionsThe vertebral FF value of IDEAL-IQ sequence has the potential to be a new biological marker for the assessment of osteoporosis. Vertebral FF is moderately negatively correlated with aBMD, especially in women, allowing accuratly quantify the bone marrow fat. R2* value is mildly to moderately correlated with BMD in men and can be served as a complementary tool in the assessment of osteoporosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.