ArticleBMC medical imaging2023
Effective automatic detection of anterior cruciate ligament injury using convolutional neural network with two attention mechanism modules.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence demonstrates comparable diagnostic accuracy to radiologists for anterior cruciate ligament tears on MRI: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Pooled it
- AI demonstrates comparable diagnostic performance to radiologists in MRI detection of anterior cruciate ligament tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Application of Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Sports Injuries and Customizing Personalized Prevention Strategies: A Scoping Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear Diagnosis: A Bibliometric Analysis of the 50 Most Cited Studies.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2026Review
- Machine and deep learning models for ligament injury recognition: a systematic review and meta-analysis of imaging and novel diagnostic techniques.EFORT open reviews · 2026Article
- Self-supervised learning with BYOL for anterior cruciate ligament tear detection from knee MRI.MethodsX · 2025Article
- Classification of anterior cruciate ligament tears in knee magnetic resonance images using pre-trained model and custom model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Anterior cruciate ligament tear detection based on Res2Net modified by improved Lévy flight distribution.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging of cruciate ligament disorders: current updates.EFORT open reviews · 2025Review
- Deep Learning Models to Detect Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury on MRI: A Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Refined Detection and Classification of Knee Ligament Injury Based on ResNet Convolutional Neural Networks.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: Current Concepts and Future Perspectives.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo develop a fully automated CNN detection system based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for ACL injury, and to explore the feasibility of CNN for ACL injury detection on MRI images.
methodsIncluding 313 patients aged 16 - 65 years old, the raw data are 368 pieces with injured ACL and 100 pieces with intact ACL. By adding flipping, rotation, scaling and other methods to expand the data, the final data set is 630 pieces including 355 pieces of injured ACL and 275 pieces of intact ACL. Using the proposed CNN model with two attention mechanism modules, data sets are trained and tested with fivefold cross-validation.
resultsThe performance is evaluated using accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity and F1 score of our proposed CNN model, with results of 0.8063, 0.7741, 0.9268, 0.6509 and 0.8436. The average accuracy in the fivefold cross-validation is 0.8064. For our model, the average area under curves (AUC) for detecting injured ACL has results of 0.8886.
conclusionWe propose an effective and automatic CNN model to detect ACL injury from MRI of human knees. This model can effectively help clinicians diagnose ACL injury, improving diagnostic efficiency and reducing misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.