Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37697177›Full record

Trial reportLasers in medical science2023

Er:YAG laser in selective caries removal and dentin treatment with chitosan: a randomized clinical trial in primary molars.

Rai Matheus Carvalho Santos, Renata Siqueira Scatolin, Sérgio Luiz de Souza Salvador, Aline Evangelista Souza-Gabriel, Silmara Aparecida Milori Corona

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rai Matheus Carvalho SantosDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Renata Siqueira ScatolinDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Avenida do Café, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, S/N, 14040-904, Brazil.
Sérgio Luiz de Souza SalvadorDepartment of Clinical Toxicology and Bromatology of the School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Aline Evangelista Souza-GabrielDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Avenida do Café, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, S/N, 14040-904, Brazil.
Silmara Aparecida Milori CoronaDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Avenida do Café, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, S/N, 14040-904, Brazil. silmaracorona@forp.usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1733-3472
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade de Ribeirão Preto · BR

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2016/14864-5Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2017/00720-4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of chitosan on dentin treatment after selective removal of caries lesions with Er:YAG laser in reducing Streptococcus mutans, as well as its effect on the performed restorations. The sample consisted of children (aged 7 to 9 years) with active carious lesions and dentin cavitation located on the occlusal surface of deciduous molars. Eighty teeth were randomly distributed into 4 groups according to the caries removal method: Er:YAG laser (250 mJ/4 Hz) or bur and dentin surface treatment: 2.5% chitosan solution or distilled water. The bacterial load of caries-affected dentin was quantified by counting CFU/mg (n = 10). The teeth were restored and evaluated at 7 days, 6 months, and 12 months using modified USPHS criteria (n = 20). Microbiological data was analyzed by Mann-Whitney and clinical analyses were done using Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn test (α = 0.05). The results showed that the Er:YAG laser significantly reduced the amount of Streptococcus mutans (p = 0.0068). After dentin treatment with chitosan, there was a significant reduction in the amount of Streptococcus mutans for both removal methods (p = 0.0424). For the retention and secondary caries criteria, no significant differences were observed along the evaluated time (p > 0.05). The laser-treated group was rated "bravo" for discoloration (p = 0.0089) and marginal adaptation (p = 0.0003) after 6 and 12 months compared to baseline. The Er:YAG laser reduced the amount of Streptococcus mutans and the chitosan showed an additional antibacterial effect. After 1 year, the Er:YAG laser-prepared teeth, regardless of the dentin treatment, showed greater discoloration and marginal adaptation of the restorations.

Indexed as

ChitosanDental CariesLasers, Solid-StateAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildDental Caries SusceptibilityDentinHumansStreptococcus mutansUnited StatesAnti-Bacterial AgentsChitosanChitosanDeciduousDentinEr-YAG laserStreptococcus mutansTooth

Identifiers

PMID37697177
OpenAlexW4386624196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.