Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37697138›Full record

ArticleBrain structure & function2023

Comprehensive voxel-wise, tract-based, and network lesion mapping reveals unique architectures of right and left visuospatial neglect.

Margaret Jane Moore, Luke Hearne, Nele Demeyere, Jason B Mattingley

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain structure & function, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Voxel-Based Lesion-Symptom Mapping Localizes Residual Visual Function in Hemianopia.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Lesion mapping in neuropsychological research: A practical and conceptual guide.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Margaret Jane MooreQueensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia. Margaret.moore@uq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6914-5978
Luke HearneQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2014-1148
Nele Demeyere *Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0416-5147
Jason B Mattingley *Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0929-9216
The University of Queensland · AUQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AUUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visuospatial neglect is a common, post-stroke cognitive impairment which is widely considered to be a disconnection syndrome. However, the patterns of disconnectivity associated with visuospatial neglect remain unclear. Here, we had 480 acute stroke survivors [age = 72.8 (SD = 13.3), 44.3% female, 7.5 days post-stroke (SD = 11.3)] undertake routine clinical imaging and standardised visuospatial neglect testing. The data were used to conduct voxel-wise, tract-level, and network-level lesion-mapping analyses aimed at localising the neural correlates of left and right egocentric (body-centred) and allocentric (object-centred) visuospatial neglect. Only minimal anatomical homogeneity was present between the correlates of right and left egocentric neglect across all analysis types. This finding challenges previous work suggesting that right and left visuospatial neglect are anatomically homologous, and instead suggests that egocentric neglect may involve damage to a shared, but hemispherically asymmetric attention network. By contrast, egocentric and allocentric neglect was associated with disconnectivity in a distinct but overlapping set of network edges, with both deficits related to damage across the dorsal and ventral attention networks. Critically, this finding suggests that the distinction between egocentric and allocentric neglect is unlikely to reflect a simple dichotomy between dorsal versus ventral networks dysfunction, as is commonly asserted. Taken together, the current findings provide a fresh perspective on the neural circuitry involved in regulating visuospatial attention, and provide important clues to understanding the cognitive and perceptual processes involved in this common and debilitating neuropsychological syndrome.

Indexed as

Perceptual DisordersStrokeAgedBrain MappingFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsSpace PerceptionAttentionLesion mappingNetwork-level lesion mappingStrokeVisuospatial neglect

Identifiers

PMID37697138
PMCPMC10587018
OpenAlexW4386615175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.