Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37697094›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2023

Not Who You Are, But Who You Are With: Re-examining Women's Less Satisfying Sexual Debuts.

Diana E Peragine, James J Kim, Jessica A Maxwell, Malvina N Skorska, Emily A Impett, William A Cunningham, Doug P VanderLaan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Diana E PeragineDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto Mississauga, 3359 Mississauga Road North, Mississauga, ON, L5L 1C6, Canada. d.peragine@utoronto.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-6696-799X
James J KimDepartment of Psychology, Western University, London, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5136-5857
Jessica A MaxwellSchool of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-5482-6911
Malvina N SkorskaChild and Youth Psychiatry, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9081-5497
Emily A ImpettDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto Mississauga, 3359 Mississauga Road North, Mississauga, ON, L5L 1C6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3348-7524
William A CunninghamDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7063-5859
Doug P VanderLaanDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto Mississauga, 3359 Mississauga Road North, Mississauga, ON, L5L 1C6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4498-9175

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada PGS DSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada 4301600445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gender differences in appraisals of first intercourse are among the largest in sexuality research, with women indicating less satisfying "sexual debuts" than men. Dispositional or "actor-level" explanations for this gender gap are pervasive, yet research has largely examined heterosexual debuts in which actor gender and partner gender are confounded. We assessed whether women's less satisfying sexual debuts are better explained by actor gender or partner gender, comparing experiences of women who debuted with men (WDM) with those of men and women who debuted with women (MDW, WDW). Retrospective accounts of sexual debut were collected from 3033 adults. At first intercourse, we found that WDW had equal physical and emotional satisfaction to MDW, and more satisfaction than WDM, suggesting satisfaction gaps owing to partner gender, not actor gender. This pattern did not extend to a comparison event (first masturbation), where WDW and WDM had similar satisfaction, but less satisfaction than MDW, suggesting an actor gender gap. To identify sources of satisfaction gaps, we probed for corresponding differences in the circumstances of sexual debut. Sexual circumstances were more strongly implicated than nonsexual ones, with relative deprivation of glans stimulation explaining relative dissatisfaction at first intercourse, but not first masturbation, and orgasm explaining it at both. Findings challenge the view that the satisfaction gap at first intercourse reflects an inherent difference between genders. Indeed, they demonstrate similarities when partner gender does not differ and suggest strategies for ensuring equal sexual satisfaction-and equal sexual rights realization-at (hetero) sexual debut.

Indexed as

OrgasmSexual BehaviorAdultEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleMasturbationPersonal SatisfactionRetrospective StudiesSexual PartnersFirst intercourseGender differencesGender similaritiesSexual debutSexual satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID37697094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.