ArticleScientific reports2023
Comparative analysis of gut microbiota between common (Macaca fascicularis fascicularis) and Burmese (M. f. aurea) long-tailed macaques in different habitats.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Article
- Characterization of gut microbiota in wild Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) from five forests across Thailand.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Subspecific variation in gut microbiota of North American bison in a sympatric setting reveals differentially abundant taxa.Animal microbiome · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The environment has an important effect on the gut microbiota-an essential part of the host's health-and is strongly influenced by the dietary pattern of the host as these together shape the composition and functionality of the gut microbiota in humans and other animals. This study compared the gut microbiota of Macaca fascicularis fascicularis and M. f. aurea in mangrove and island populations using 16S rRNA gene sequencing on a nanopore platform to investigate the effect of the environment and/or diet. The results revealed that the M. f. fascicularis populations that received anthropogenic food exhibited a higher richness and evenness of gut microbiota than the M. f. aurea populations in different habitats. Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were the two most abundant bacterial phyla in the gut microbiota of both these subspecies; however, the relative abundance of these phyla was significantly higher in M. f. aurea than in M. f. fascicularis. This variation in the gut microbiota between the two subspecies in different habitats mostly resulted from the differences in their diets. Moreover, the specific adaptation of M. f. aurea to different environments with a different food availability had a significant effect on their microbial composition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.