ArticleScientific reports2023
An analytical method informed by clinical imaging data for estimating outlet boundary conditions in computational fluid dynamics analysis of carotid artery blood flow.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparing biomechanical platelet activation in the carotid artery by computational and experimental modeling.Blood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis · 2026Article
- Hemodynamic effects of stenosis with varying severity in different segments of the carotid artery using computational fluid dynamics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Sphenoid sinus hyperpneumatization: anatomical variants, molecular blueprints, and AI-augmented roadmaps for skull base surgery.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Branching and nonbranching intracranial aneurysms in the presence of a persistent stapedial artery and an aberrant internal carotid artery assessed with computational hemodynamics: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2024Article
- Initial experience with radiomics of carotid perivascular adipose tissue in identifying symptomatic plaque.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Differential sensitivities to blood pressure variations in internal carotid and intracranial arteries: a numerical approach to stroke prediction.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stroke occur mainly due to arterial thrombosis and rupture of cerebral blood vessels. Previous studies showed that blood flow-induced wall shear stress is an essential bio marker for estimating atherogenesis. It is a common practice to use computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations to calculate wall shear stress and to quantify blood flow. Reliability of predicted CFD results greatly depends on the accuracy of applied boundary conditions. Previously, the boundary conditions were estimated by varying values so that they matched the clinical data. It is applicable upon the availability of clinical data. Meanwhile, in most cases all that can be accessed are arterial geometry and inflow rate. Consequently, there is a need to devise a tool to estimate boundary values such as resistance and compliance of arteries. This study proposes an analytical framework to estimate the boundary conditions for a carotid artery based on the geometries of the downstream arteries available from clinical images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.