Trial reportThorax2023
Laryngeal widening and adequate ventilation by expiratory pressure load training improve aerobic capacity in COPD: a randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in Thorax, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Respiratory Muscle Strength and Mortality in Patients with COPD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Pooled it
- Laryngeal Responses During Non-Invasive Ventilation in Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Observational Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Observational
- Exercise alveolar oxygen extraction rate reflects ventilatory efficiency and predicts outcomes in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- Gas exchange efficiency slopes to assess exercise tolerance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleDespite strategies acting on peripheral airway obstruction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), exercise intolerance remains inadequately improved. We hypothesised that laryngeal narrowing is a potential treatment target of expiratory pressure load training (EPT) to improve exercise intolerance in COPD.
methodsThe effect of 3-month EPT was assessed in 47 patients with COPD divided into Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) mild-to-moderate (I-II) and severe-to-very severe (III-IV), randomly allocating 1:1 to EPT or control groups. The primary outcome was endurance time in the constant work rate exercise test in GOLD III-IV patients.
resultsCompared with controls, EPT increased: (1) endurance time, with estimated treatment effect: +703 (95% CI: 379 to 1031) s, p=0.0008 (GOLD I-II); +390 (95% CI: 205 to 574) s, p=0.0006 (GOLD III-IV); (2) peak oxygen uptake (p=0.0086 in GOLD I-II; p=0.0004 in GOLD III-IV); (3) glottic dilatation ratio at maximum collapse on laryngoscopy in the submaximal exercise (p=0.0062 in GOLD I-II; p=0.0001 in GOLD III-IV); and (4) the inflection point of expiratory tidal volume relative to minute ventilation during the incremental exercise (p=0.0015 in GOLD I-II; p=0.0075 in GOLD III-IV). Across GOLD grades, the responses of glottic dilatation ratio at maximum collapse and the expiratory tidal volume at the inflection point were selected as more influential variables correlating with the improvement in peak oxygen uptake and endurance time, respectively.
conclusionThese results show that EPT improved aerobic capacity and endurance time with larger laryngeal widening and adequate ventilation despite advanced COPD. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000041250.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.