Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37696577›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2023

Mechanisms of Intrinsic Postzygotic Isolation: From Traditional Genic and Chromosomal Views to Genomic and Epigenetic Perspectives.

Radka Reifová, S Lorena Ament-Velásquez, Yann Bourgeois, Jenn Coughlan, Jonna Kulmuni, Agnieszka P Lipinska, Genta Okude, Laurie Stevison, Kohta Yoshida, Jun Kitano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. A species interaction kick-starts ecological speciation in allopatry.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Mouse X-linked microRNA cluster regulates the meiotic checkpoint andProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. The Ecology of Hybrid Incompatibilities.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. How Important Is Sexual Isolation to Speciation?Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  20. Structural Variants and Speciation: Multiple Processes at Play.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Radka ReifováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic radka.reifova@natur.cuni.cz jkitano@nig.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-5852-5174
S Lorena Ament-VelásquezDepartment of Zoology, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3371-9292
Yann BourgeoisDIADE, University of Montpellier, CIRAD, IRD, 34090 Montpellier, France.
Jenn CoughlanDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3893-045X
Jonna KulmuniInstitute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, Department of Evolutionary and Population Biology, University of Amsterdam, 1012 Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8852-0793
Agnieszka P LipinskaDepartment of Algal Development and Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Biology, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1829-8293
Genta OkudeDepartment of Genomics and Evolutionary Biology, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7272-8004
Laurie StevisonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7900-5266
Kohta YoshidaDepartment of Genomics and Evolutionary Biology, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5896-7383
Jun KitanoDepartment of Genomics and Evolutionary Biology, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan radka.reifova@natur.cuni.cz jkitano@nig.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-8659-5698

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrinsic postzygotic isolation typically appears as reduced viability or fertility of interspecific hybrids caused by genetic incompatibilities between diverged parental genomes. Dobzhansky-Muller interactions among individual genes, and chromosomal rearrangements causing problems with chromosome synapsis and recombination in meiosis, have both long been considered as major mechanisms behind intrinsic postzygotic isolation. Recent research has, however, suggested that the genetic basis of intrinsic postzygotic isolation can be more complex and involves, for example, overall divergence of the DNA sequence or epigenetic changes. Here, we review the mechanisms of intrinsic postzygotic isolation from genic, chromosomal, genomic, and epigenetic perspectives across diverse taxa. We provide empirical evidence for these mechanisms, discuss their importance in the speciation process, and highlight questions that remain unanswered.

Indexed as

ChromosomesGenomicsGenetic SpeciationGenomeHybridization, GeneticReproductive Isolation

Identifiers

PMID37696577
PMCPMC10547394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.