ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2023
Scorpion Sting Envenomation, a Neglected Tropical Disease: A Nationwide Survey Exploring Perspectives and Attitudes of Resident Doctors from India.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Scorpionism at the human-environment interface: an eco-epidemiological synthesis and conceptual framework.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Scorpionism in the Amazon: Evidence, Challenges and Actions for Controlling a Neglected Disease.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2026Review
- Article
- Scorpions are taking over: the silent and escalating public health crisis in Brazil.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Scorpionism: a neglected tropical disease with global public health implications.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scorpion sting envenomation (SSE) is a commonly encountered and a significant problem in the tropics, affecting rural and marginalized communities. However, it is not formally listed as a neglected tropical disease (NTD) by the WHO. We designed this cross-sectional study to explore medical graduates' and resident doctors' perspectives on SSE as an NTD and to assess their experiences, knowledge, and confidence in managing these patients. An online questionnaire was developed, validated, and administered to interns and resident doctors across India. Adjusted odds ratios were calculated for factors predicting high self-reported confidence scores for managing scorpion stings using multivariable logistic regression. The final questionnaire contained 26 items including participant background, perspectives about SSE being an NTD, experiences, knowledge, and skills needed to manage, and prevent stings effectively. Of 454 participants, 69% opined that SSE was an NTD, and > 60% felt that SSE was inadequately addressed within undergraduate training. Predictors of high self-reported confidence scores in management competencies were residency in a clinical branch that commonly encountered SSE (internal/emergency medicine or pediatrics, P < 0.0001), having ever managed an SSE patient alone or as a part of a team (P < 0.0001), and attending a class or teaching session on SSE during undergraduate training (P = 0.048). Our results suggest that residents across India believe that there is an urgent need to declare SSE an NTD to increase its visibility, further paving the way for innovative multilevel cross-cutting solutions for mitigation. Designing authentic learning experiences can help produce competent and empathetic physicians in managing and preventing SSE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.