Trial reportOphthalmology2024
Eight-Year Outcomes of Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recessions versus Unilateral Recession-Resection in Childhood Basic-Type Intermittent Exotropia.
Trial report in Ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01032603 (A Randomized Trial of Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession Versus Unilateral Lateral Rectus Recession With Medial Rectus Resection for Intermittent Exotropia), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Trial of Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession Versus Unilateral Lateral Rectus Recession With Medial Rectus Resection for Intermittent Exotropia
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Initial postoperative alignment versus long-term outcomes in intermittent exotropia surgery.Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus · 2026Trial
- Virtual Reality-Based Vision Therapy for Intermittent Exotropia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Perceptual Learning Based on Adaptive Contrast Detection Training for Intermittent Exotropia: A Pilot Double-Masked Randomized Controlled Study.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Trial
- Clinical Outcomes of Individualized Office-Based Vision Therapy for Intermittent Exotropia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Challenge to the concept of surgical dose-response for moderate to large angle exotropia.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Long-Term Outcomes of Intermittent Exotropia: A Real-World Longitudinal Cohort Study of 415 Patients.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Risk Factors of Residual Exotropia After Surgery in Patients with Intermittent and Sensory Exotropia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Surgical Dosing for V-Pattern Exotropia.American journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Clinical Features According to the Type of Intermittent Exotropia: Korean Intermittent Exotropia Multicenter Study.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Success of Strabismus Surgery in Intermittent Exotropia.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- One-Month-Old Rabbits Exhibit a Longer Postoperative Remodeling in Extraocular Muscles Compared to 3-Month-Old Rabbits.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Early postoperative alignment and preoperative stereopsis as determinants of success in intermittent exotropia surgery.PloS one · 2025Article
- Risk of Bias When Using Early Failure Criteria in Randomized Clinical Trials With Stereoacuity Outcomes.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo report 8-year outcomes from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing bilateral lateral rectus muscle recession (BLRc) with unilateral recession-resection (R&R) for childhood intermittent exotropia (IXT).
designEight-year follow-up of RCT cohort.
participantsOf 197 randomized participants, 123 agreed to continue follow-up after the 3-year outcome visit (baseline age, 3-< 11 years; basic-type IXT, 15-40 prism diopters [Δ] by prism and alternate cover test [PACT]; baseline stereoacuity, ≤ 400 arcsec; no prior surgery).
methodsAfter the RCT primary outcome at 3 years, annual follow-up from 4 through 8 years with treatment at investigator discretion.
main outcome measuresSuboptimal surgical outcome by 8 years after randomization, defined as any of the following at any visit: exotropia of 10 Δ or more by simultaneous prism cover test (SPCT) at distance or near, constant esotropia (ET) of 6 Δ or more by SPCT at distance or near, loss of near stereoacuity by 0.6 log arcsec or more from baseline, or reoperation. Secondary outcomes included (1) reoperation by 8 years and (2) complete or near-complete resolution at 8 years, defined as exodeviation of less than 10 Δ by SPCT and PACT at distance and near and 10 Δ or more reduction from baseline by PACT at distance and near, ET of less than 6 Δ at distance and near, no decrease in stereoacuity by 0.6 log arcsec or more from baseline, and no reoperation or nonsurgical treatment for IXT.
resultsThe Kaplan-Meier cumulative probability of suboptimal surgical outcome through 8 years was 68% (55 events among 101 at risk) for BLRc and 53% (42 events among 96 at risk) for R&R (difference, 15%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2% to 32%; P = 0.08). Complete or near-complete resolution at 8 years occurred in 15% (7/46) for BLRc and 37% (16/43) for R&R (difference, -22%; 95% CI, -44% to -0.1%; P = 0.049). The cumulative probability of reoperation was 30% for BLRc and 11% for R&R (difference, 19%; 95% CI, 2%-36%; P = 0.049).
conclusionsDespite no significant difference for the primary outcome, the 95% CI did not exclude a moderate benefit of R&R, which together with secondary outcomes suggests that unilateral R&R followed by usual care may yield better long-term outcomes than BLRc followed by usual care for basic-type childhood IXT using these surgical doses. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.