ArticleMedical physics2024
Evaluation of ion chamber response for applications in electron FLASH radiotherapy.
Article in Medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of a Faraday cup-style detector as a beam diagnostic system for ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) electron beams.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Volumetric FLASH dosimetryPhysics in medicine and biology · 2026Article
- Development and evaluation of an in vivo dose-based monitoring system for electron FLASH radiation therapy.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a novel pulse optimization and beam control system for conventional and ultra high dose-per-pulse (FLASH) irradiation.Medical physics · 2026Article
- High-Speed Detection of X-ray Pulses Using a Digital Counter Coupled with Perovskite Composite Scintillators.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Article
- Beam intensity and stability control on a modified clinical linear accelerator for FLASH irradiation.Physics in medicine and biology · 2025Article
- Discordance in Acute Gastrointestinal Toxicity between Synchrotron-Based Proton and Linac-based Electron Ultra-High Dose Rate Irradiation.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025Article
- Imaging system for real-time, full-field pulse-by-pulse surface dosimetry of UHDR electron beams.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Characterization of a Time-Resolved, Real-Time Scintillation Dosimetry System for Ultra-High Dose-Rate Radiation Therapy Applications.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025Article
- On the acceptance, commissioning, and quality assurance of electron FLASH units.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Range quality assurance measurements for clinical and FLASH proton beam therapy using the quality assurance range calorimeter.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Development of novel ionization chambers for reference dosimetry in electron flash radiotherapy.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Characterization of a commercial plastic scintillator for electron FLASH dosimetry.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- Electron beam response corrections for an ultra-high-dose-rate capable diode dosimeter.Medical physics · 2024Article
- A comprehensive investigation of the performance of a commercial scintillator system for applications in electron FLASH radiotherapy.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Technical note: High-dose and ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) evaluation of AlMedical physics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ion chambers are required for calibration and reference dosimetry applications in radiation therapy (RT). However, exposure of ion chambers in ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) conditions pertinent to FLASH-RT leads to severe saturation and ion recombination, which limits their performance and usability. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively evaluate a set of commonly used commercially available ion chambers in RT, all with different design characteristics, and use this information to produce a prototype ion chamber with improved performance in UHDR conditions as a first step toward ion chambers specific for FLASH-RT. The Advanced Markus and Exradin A10, A26, and A20 ion chambers were evaluated. The chambers were placed in a water tank, at a depth of 2 cm, and exposed to an UHDR electron beam at different pulse repetition frequency (PRF), pulse width (PW), and pulse amplitude settings on an IntraOp Mobetron. Ion chamber responses were investigated for the various beam parameter settings to isolate their dependence on integrated dose, mean dose rate and instantaneous dose rate, dose-per-pulse (DPP), and their design features such as chamber type, bias voltage, and collection volume. Furthermore, a thin parallel-plate (TPP) prototype ion chamber with reduced collector plate separation and volume was constructed and equally evaluated as the other chambers. The charge collection efficiency of the investigated ion chambers decreased with increasing DPP, whereas the mean dose rate did not affect the response of the chambers (± 1%). The dependence of the chamber response on DPP was found to be solely related to the total dose within the pulse, and not on mean dose rate, PW, or instantaneous dose rate within the ranges investigated. The polarity correction factor (P
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.