Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37696029›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2024

Quantifying U-Net uncertainty in multi-parametric MRI-based glioma segmentation by spherical image projection.

Zhenyu Yang, Kyle Lafata, Eugene Vaios, Zongsheng Hu, Trey Mullikin, Fang-Fang Yin, Chunhao Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhenyu YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Kyle LafataDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Eugene VaiosDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Zongsheng HuDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Trey MullikinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Fang-Fang YinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Chunhao WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Women's Cancer Research ProgramP30CA014236 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHN N. NORTON · 1985 to 2026
$174.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUncertainty quantification in deep learning is an important research topic. For medical image segmentation, the uncertainty measurements are usually reported as the likelihood that each pixel belongs to the predicted segmentation region. In potential clinical applications, the uncertainty result reflects the algorithm's robustness and supports the confidence and trust of the segmentation result when the ground-truth result is absent. For commonly studied deep learning models, novel methods for quantifying segmentation uncertainty are in demand. PURPOSE: To develop a U-Net segmentation uncertainty quantification method based on spherical image projection of multi-parametric MRI (MP-MRI) in glioma segmentation.

methodsThe projection of planar MRI data onto a spherical surface is equivalent to a nonlinear image transformation that retains global anatomical information. By incorporating this image transformation process in our proposed spherical projection-based U-Net (SPU-Net) segmentation model design, multiple independent segmentation predictions can be obtained from a single MRI. The final segmentation is the average of all available results, and the variation can be visualized as a pixel-wise uncertainty map. An uncertainty score was introduced to evaluate and compare the performance of uncertainty measurements. The proposed SPU-Net model was implemented on the basis of 369 glioma patients with MP-MRI scans (T1, T1-Ce, T2, and FLAIR). Three SPU-Net models were trained to segment enhancing tumor (ET), tumor core (TC), and whole tumor (WT), respectively. The SPU-Net model was compared with (1) the classic U-Net model with test-time augmentation (TTA) and (2) linear scaling-based U-Net (LSU-Net) segmentation models in terms of both segmentation accuracy (Dice coefficient, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy) and segmentation uncertainty (uncertainty map and uncertainty score).

resultsThe developed SPU-Net model successfully achieved low uncertainty for correct segmentation predictions (e.g., tumor interior or healthy tissue interior) and high uncertainty for incorrect results (e.g., tumor boundaries). This model could allow the identification of missed tumor targets or segmentation errors in U-Net. Quantitatively, the SPU-Net model achieved the highest uncertainty scores for three segmentation targets (ET/TC/WT): 0.826/0.848/0.936, compared to 0.784/0.643/0.872 using the U-Net with TTA and 0.743/0.702/0.876 with the LSU-Net (scaling factor = 2). The SPU-Net also achieved statistically significantly higher Dice coefficients, underscoring the improved segmentation accuracy.

conclusionThe SPU-Net model offers a powerful tool to quantify glioma segmentation uncertainty while improving segmentation accuracy. The proposed method can be generalized to other medical image-related deep-learning applications for uncertainty evaluation.

Indexed as

GliomaMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingProbabilityUncertaintydeep learningglioma segmentationsegmentation uncertaintyspherical projection

Identifiers

PMID37696029
PMCPMC10925552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.