Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37695904›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

A synergistic future for AI and ecology.

Barbara A Han, Kush R Varshney, Shannon LaDeau, Ajit Subramaniam, Kathleen C Weathers, Jacob Zwart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Challenges and opportunities of ML and explainable AI in large-sample hydrology.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Modeling zoonotic and vector-borne viruses.Current opinion in virology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Barbara A HanCary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, NY 12545.ORCID 0000-0002-9948-3078
Kush R VarshneyIBM Research - Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598.ORCID 0000-0002-7376-5536
Shannon LaDeauCary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, NY 12545.ORCID 0000-0003-4825-5435
Ajit SubramaniamLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY 10964.ORCID 0000-0003-1316-5827
Kathleen C WeathersCary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, NY 12545.ORCID 0000-0002-3575-6508
Jacob ZwartU.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Mission Area, Integrated Information Dissemination Division, San Francisco, CA 94116.ORCID 0000-0002-3870-405X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research in both ecology and AI strives for predictive understanding of complex systems, where nonlinearities arise from multidimensional interactions and feedbacks across multiple scales. After a century of independent, asynchronous advances in computational and ecological research, we foresee a critical need for intentional synergy to meet current societal challenges against the backdrop of global change. These challenges include understanding the unpredictability of systems-level phenomena and resilience dynamics on a rapidly changing planet. Here, we spotlight both the promise and the urgency of a convergence research paradigm between ecology and AI. Ecological systems are a challenge to fully and holistically model, even using the most prominent AI technique today: deep neural networks. Moreover, ecological systems have emergent and resilient behaviors that may inspire new, robust AI architectures and methodologies. We share examples of how challenges in ecological systems modeling would benefit from advances in AI techniques that are themselves inspired by the systems they seek to model. Both fields have inspired each other, albeit indirectly, in an evolution toward this convergence. We emphasize the need for more purposeful synergy to accelerate the understanding of ecological resilience whilst building the resilience currently lacking in modern AI systems, which have been shown to fail at times because of poor generalization in different contexts. Persistent epistemic barriers would benefit from attention in both disciplines. The implications of a successful convergence go beyond advancing ecological disciplines or achieving an artificial general intelligence-they are critical for both persisting and thriving in an uncertain future.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceLepidopteraAnimalsEcosystemGeneralization, PsychologicalNeural Networks, Computercomplex systemsdeep learningecosystemsinterpretable AIprediction

Identifiers

PMID37695904
PMCPMC10515155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.