Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37695667›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2023

Remote Recruitment Strategy and Structured E-Parenting Support (STEPS) App: Feasibility and Usability Study.

Katarzyna Kostyrka-Allchorne, Petrina Chu, Claire Ballard, Nancy Lean, Blandine French, Ellen Hedstrom, Sarah Byford, Samuele Cortese, David Daley, Johnny Downs and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Katarzyna Kostyrka-AllchorneDepartment of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0789-2449
Petrina ChuDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5743-5262
Claire BallardDepartment of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7915-6504
Nancy LeanDepartment of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7468-9215
Blandine FrenchAcademic Unit of Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9395-5919
Ellen HedstromSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2952-4612
Sarah ByfordDepartment of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7084-1495
Samuele CorteseSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5877-8075
David DaleyNottingham Trent University Psychology, School of Social Science, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3597-0408
Johnny DownsDepartment of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8061-295X
Cristine GlazebrookAcademic Unit of Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7459-9445
Kimberley GoldsmithDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0620-7868
Charlotte L HallAcademic Unit of Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5412-6165
Hanna KovshoffSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6041-0376
Jana KreppnerSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3527-9083
Kapil SayalAcademic Unit of Mental Health & Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2050-4316
James ShearerDepartment of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1658-9767
Emily SimonoffDepartment of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5450-0823
Margaret ThompsonSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0373-0266
Edmund J S Sonuga-BarkeDepartment of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6996-3935

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Structured E-Parenting Support (STEPS) app provides support for parents of children with elevated hyperactivity, impulsivity, inattention, and conduct problems who are awaiting clinical assessment. STEPS will be evaluated in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) within the Online Parent Training for the Initial Management of ADHD Referrals (OPTIMA) research program in the United Kingdom. Phase 1 of the OPTIMA tested the feasibility of participants' recruitment and the app's usability.

objectiveThis study aimed to adapt a digital routine clinical monitoring system, myHealthE, for research purposes to facilitate waitlist recruitment; test using remote methods to screen and identify participants quickly and systematically; pilot the acceptability of the recruitment and assessment protocol; and explore the usability of STEPS.

methodsmyHealthE was adapted to screen patients' data. Parents' and clinicians' feedback on myHealthE was collected, and information governance reviews were conducted in clinical services planning to host the RCT. Potential participants for the observational feasibility study were identified from new referrals using myHealthE and non-myHealthE methods. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the demographic and outcome variables. We estimated whether the recruitment rate would meet the planned RCT sample size requirement (n=352). In addition to the feasibility study participants, another group of parents was recruited to assess the STEPS usability. They completed the adapted System Usability Scale and responded to open-ended questions about the app, which were coded using the Enlight quality construct template.

resultsOverall, 124 potential participants were identified as eligible: 121 (97.6%) via myHealthE and 3 (2.4%) via non-myHealthE methods. In total, 107 parents were contacted, and 48 (44.9%) consented and were asked if, hypothetically, they would be willing to participate in the OPTIMA RCT. Of the 28 feasibility study participants who provided demographic data, 21 (75%) identified as White. Their children had an average age of 8.4 (SD 1.7) years and 65% (31/48) were male. During the primary recruitment period (June to July 2021) when 45 participants had consented, 38 (84%) participants agreed hypothetically to take part in the RCT (rate of 19/mo, 95% CI 13.5-26.1), meeting the stop-go criterion of 18 participants per month to proceed with the RCT. All parents were satisfied or very satisfied with the study procedures. Parents (n=12) recruited to assess STEPS' usability described it as easy to navigate and use and as having an attractive combination of colors and visual design. They described the content as useful, pitched at the right level, and sensitively presented. Suggested improvements included adding captions to videos or making the recorded reflections editable.

conclusionsRemote recruitment and study procedures for testing a parenting intervention app are feasible and acceptable for parents. The parents felt that STEPS was a useful and easy-to-use digital parenting support tool. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1186/s40814-021-00959-0.

Indexed as

ADHDattention-deficit/hyperactivity disorderbehavior problemschildrenmHealthmobile appmobile healthmobile phoneparenting interventionusability

Identifiers

PMID37695667
PMCPMC10520770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.