Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37695653›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of radiation biology2024

Minimum reporting standards should be expected for preclinical radiobiology irradiators and dosimetry in the published literature.

François Trompier, Larry A DeWerd, Yannick Poirier, Morgane Dos Santos, Ke Sheng, Keith A Kunugi, Thomas A Winters, Andrea L DiCarlo, Merriline Satyamitra

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of radiation biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

François TrompierIonizing Radiation Dosimetry Laboratory (LDRI), Human Radiation Protection Unity, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8776-6572
Larry A DeWerdMedical Radiation Research Center, Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2003-2344
Yannick PoirierDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6548-8321
Morgane Dos SantosDepartment of Radiobiology and Regenerative Medicine (SERAMED), Radiobiology of Accidental, Exposure Laboratory (LRAcc), Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2139-2675
Ke ShengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6696-5409
Keith A KunugiMedical Radiation Research Center, Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7666-5904
Thomas A WintersRadiation and Nuclear Countermeasures Program (RNCP), Division of Allergy, Immunology and Transplantation (DAIT), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Rockville, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4206-0020
Andrea L DiCarloRadiation and Nuclear Countermeasures Program (RNCP), Division of Allergy, Immunology and Transplantation (DAIT), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Rockville, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8113-0015
Merriline SatyamitraRadiation and Nuclear Countermeasures Program (RNCP), Division of Allergy, Immunology and Transplantation (DAIT), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Rockville, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2207-4636

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 AI999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cornerstones of science advancement are rigor in performing scientific research, reproducibility of research findings and unbiased reporting of design and results of the experiments. For radiation research, this requires rigor in describing experimental details as well as the irradiation protocols for accurate, precise and reproducible dosimetry. Most institutions conducting radiation biology research in in vitro or animal models do not have describe experimental irradiation protocols in sufficient details to allow for balanced review of their publication nor for other investigators to replicate published experiments. The need to increase and improve dosimetry standards, traceability to National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standard beamlines, and to provide dosimetry harmonization within the radiation biology community has been noted for over a decade both within the United States and France. To address this requirement subject matter experts have outlined minimum reporting standards that should be included in published literature for preclinical irradiators and dosimetry.

Indexed as

RadiobiologyRadiometryAnimalsFranceModels, AnimalReproducibility of ResultsUnited Statesdosimetry standards and NIST traceabilityminimum reporting requirementsRadiation dosimetry

Identifiers

PMID37695653
PMCPMC10841746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.