Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37695623›Full record

Trial reportJAMA neurology2023

Efficacy and Safety of Ravulizumab, a Complement C5 Inhibitor, in Adults With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Angela Genge, Leonard H van den Berg, Glen Frick, Steve Han, Cori Abikoff, Adam Simmons, Qun Lin, Kaushik Patra, Erik Kupperman, James D Berry

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04248465 (A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group, Multicenter Study With an Open-Label Extension to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ravulizumab in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04248465 phase3terminatednot on this map

A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group, Multicenter Study With an Open-Label Extension to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ravulizumab in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ran2020 to 2021Enrolled382ConditionsAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, ALSArmsPlacebo, Ravulizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Complement in brain and eye disease: shared mechanisms, convergent pathologies, and common therapeutic opportunities.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Angela GengeMcGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Leonard H van den BergUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Glen FrickAlexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, Boston, Massachusetts.
Steve HanAlexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, Boston, Massachusetts.
Cori AbikoffAlexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, Boston, Massachusetts.
Adam SimmonsAlexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, Boston, Massachusetts.
Qun LinAlexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kaushik PatraAlexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, Boston, Massachusetts.
Erik KuppermanAlexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, Boston, Massachusetts.
James D BerrySean M. Healey and AMG Center for ALS, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Alexion Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USMcGill University · CAUltragenyx Pharmaceutical (United States) · USUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Additional therapies for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) are urgently needed. Immune-mediated complement activation may be involved in ALS pathogenesis as evidenced by the upregulation of terminal components; thus, complement inhibition could potentially slow progression. Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the terminal complement C5 inhibitor ravulizumab in adults with ALS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multinational, randomized, phase 3 clinical trial was conducted from March 30, 2020, to October 17, 2021, in 81 ALS specialty centers across 17 countries. A preplanned, unmasked, nonbinding interim futility analysis was conducted when 33% of participants had completed week 26, wherein a conditional power of less than 10% would halt the trial. A total of 478 individuals were screened, and 96 were excluded. Inclusion criteria were weight of 40 kg or more, fulfillment of the El Escorial diagnostic criteria, and a minimal prestudy Revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) progression score of -0.3 points per month. Interventions: Study treatment consisted of placebo or a weight-based dose of intravenous ravulizumab every 8 weeks until week 42. Participants could continue standard-of-care treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was change from baseline in ALSFRS-R score at week 50 based on the Combined Assessment of Function and Survival (CAFS). Results: A total of 382 participants were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive ravulizumab (n = 255; mean [SD] age, 58.6 [10.6] years; 94 female [36.9%] and 161 male [63.1%]) or placebo (n = 127; mean [SD] age, 58.0 [11.0] years; 58 female [45.7%] and 69 male [54.3%]). The interim analysis showed that the observed mean change from baseline in ALSFRS-R at week 50 was -14.67 points (SE, 0.89 points; 95% CI, -16.42 to -12.91 points) for ravulizumab and -13.33 points (SE, 1.22 points; 95% CI, -15.72 to -10.93 points) for placebo, with no significant difference between the groups (mean [SE] difference, -1.34 [1.46] points; 95% CI, -4.21 to 1.53 points). Based on these data, the trial was terminated for futility. The primary analysis at week 50 showed no significant difference in CAFS between groups (mean [SE], 5.5 [10.8] points; 95% CI, -15.7 to 26.6 points; P = .61). Overall incidence rates for treatment-emergent adverse events were similar for ravulizumab (204 participants [80.0%]) and placebo (108 participants [85.0%]). Conclusions and Relevance: This trial rapidly showed that terminal complement C5 inhibition with ravulizumab did not slow functional decline in participants with ALS and that the safety profiles of ravulizumab and placebo were similar. Highly effective, novel treatments are critically needed to slow functional decline and extend survival in patients with ALS. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04248465.

Indexed as

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAdultAgedComplement C5Complement Inactivating AgentsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedComplement C5Complement Inactivating Agentsravulizumab

Identifiers

PMID37695623
PMCPMC10495927
OpenAlexW4386592045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.