Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37695621›Full record

Trial reportJAMA internal medicine2023

Automated Opt-Out vs Opt-In Patient Outreach Strategies for Breast Cancer Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Leah M Marcotte, Stefanie Deeds, Chelle Wheat, Eric Gunnink, Kristen Gray, Jorge Rojas, Carolyn Finch, Karin Nelson, Ashok Reddy

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA internal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05313737 (Opt-in vs. Opt-out Mammography Screening Outreach), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05313737 naunknown statusnot on this map

Opt-in vs. Opt-out Mammography Screening Outreach: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Puget Sound Health Care SystemRan2022 to 2022Enrolled871ConditionsBreast CancerArmsAutomated message, Opt-out scheduling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Errors in the Abstract Results and Figure.JAMA internal medicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leah M MarcotteDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Stefanie DeedsDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Chelle WheatCenter for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Eric GunninkCenter for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Kristen GrayCenter for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Jorge RojasCenter for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Carolyn FinchVA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Karin NelsonDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Ashok ReddyDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
VA Puget Sound Health Care System · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

CATALyST: Consortium for Applied Training to Advance the Learning health system with Scholars/TraineesK12HS026369 · AHRQ · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI LOZANO, PAULA, RALSTON, JAMES D. · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
AHRQ HHS K12 HS026369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Optimal strategies for population-based outreach for breast cancer screening remain unknown. Objective: To evaluate the effect on breast cancer screening of an opt-out automatic mammography referral strategy compared with an opt-in automated telephone message strategy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This pragmatic randomized clinical trial was conducted from April 2022 to January 2023 at a single Veterans Affairs (VA) medical center. Participants were female veterans aged 45 to 75 years who were eligible for breast cancer screening and enrolled in VA primary care. Intervention: Veterans were randomized 1:1 to receive either an automatic mammography referral (opt-out arm) or an automated telephone call with an option for mammography referral (opt-in arm). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was completed mammography 100 days after outreach. Secondary outcomes were scheduled or completed mammography by 100 days after outreach and referrals canceled if mammography was not scheduled within 90 days. Both intention-to-treat analyses and a restricted analysis were conducted. The restricted analysis excluded veterans who were unable to be reached by telephone (eg, a nonworking number) or who were found to be ineligible after randomization (eg, medical record documentation of recent mammography). Results: Of 883 veterans due for mammography (mean [SD] age, 59.13 [8.24] years; 656 [74.3%] had received prior mammography), 442 were randomized to the opt-in group and 441 to the opt-out group. In the intention-to-treat analysis, there was no significant difference in the primary outcome of completed mammography at 100 days between the opt-out and opt-in groups (67 [15.2%] vs 66 [14.9%]; P = .90) or the secondary outcome of completed or scheduled mammography (84 [19%] vs 106 [24.0%]; P = .07). A higher number of referrals were canceled in the opt-out group compared with the opt-in group (104 [23.6%] vs 24 [5.4%]; P < .001). The restricted analysis demonstrated similar results except more veterans completed or scheduled mammography within 100 days in the opt-out group compared with the opt-in group (102 of 388 [26.3%] vs 80 of 415 [19.3%]; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, an opt-out population-based breast cancer screening outreach approach compared with an opt-in approach did not result in a significant difference in mammography completion but did lead to substantially more canceled mammography referrals, increasing staff burden. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05313737.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsVeteransAgedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMammographyMedical RecordsMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID37695621
PMCPMC10495926
OpenAlexW4386593383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.