Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37695585›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2023

Chatbot-Delivered Online Intervention to Promote Seasonal Influenza Vaccination During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Zixin Wang, Paul Shing-Fong Chan, Yuan Fang, Fuk-Yuen Yu, Danhua Ye, Qingpeng Zhang, Martin C S Wong, Phoenix K H Mo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05155241 (A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating an Online Intervention Based on the Trans-Theoretical Model in Increasing Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Among Community Dwelling People Aged ≥65 Years), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05155241 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating an Online Intervention Based on the Trans-Theoretical Model in Increasing Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Among Community Dwelling People Aged ≥65 Years

TypeinterventionalSponsorChinese University of Hong KongRan2021 to 2022Enrolled396ConditionsVaccination RefusalArmsonline health promotion video, Control (same online health promotion video)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zixin WangJC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Paul Shing-Fong ChanJC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yuan FangDepartment of Health and Physical Education, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Fuk-Yuen YuJC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Danhua YeJC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Qingpeng ZhangMusketeers Foundation Institute of Data Science, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Martin C S WongJC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Phoenix K H MoJC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Chinese University of Hong Kong · CNEducation University of Hong Kong · HKUniversity of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Receiving seasonal influenza vaccination (SIV) is important for adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. There are few robust evaluations of tailored interventions for improving SIV uptake among adults 65 years or older. Objective: To evaluate the relative efficacy of a stages of change (SOC)-tailored online intervention compared with a standard, non-SOC-tailored online intervention in increasing SIV uptake among Hong Kong residents 65 years or older. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nonblinded parallel-group randomized clinical trial was conducted between December 1, 2021, and July 31, 2022, in Hong Kong, China. Eligible participants were 65 years or older, had Cantonese- and/or Mandarin-speaking skills, were community-dwelling, had Hong Kong residency, were smartphone users, and had not received SIV for the 2021 to 2022 influenza season. Participants were recruited through random telephone calls, and those who completed the baseline telephone survey were randomized to either the intervention or control group. Both complete case and intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses were performed. Intervention: In the intervention group, a simplified rule-based chatbot first assessed participants' SOC related to SIV uptake and then automatically selected and sent participants SOC-tailored online health promotion messages (videos) through a messaging application (WhatsApp; Meta) once every 2 weeks for 4 sessions. In the control group, the chatbot sent a link to access through the messaging application a standard online health promotion message (video) covering general SIV information every 2 weeks for 4 sessions. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was self-reported SIV uptake at month 6, which was validated by the research team. The secondary outcome was SOC measured at both baseline and month 6 by validated questions. Results: A total of 396 participants (mean [SD] age of 70.2 [4.3] years; 249 females [62.9%]) were randomized to the intervention (n = 198) or control (n = 198) group. The ITT analysis showed that the validated SIV uptake rate was higher in the intervention group than the control group at month 6 (50.5% vs 35.3%; P = .002). The mean (SD) SOC score was higher in the intervention group than the control group (2.8 [1.4] vs 2.4 [1.4]; P = .02). More participants in the intervention group completed at least 1 episode of intervention than in the control group (77.3% vs 62.6%; P < .001). Conclusions: Results of this trial indicate that the SOC-tailored online intervention was more effective than the non-SOC-tailored intervention and may be a sustainable new method in increasing SIV uptake among adults 65 years or older. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05155241.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza, HumanInternet-Based InterventionAdultChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansPandemicsSeasons

Identifiers

PMID37695585
PMCPMC10495860
OpenAlexW4386592705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.