ArticleJAMA network open2023
Biochemical Recurrence and Risk of Mortality Following Radiotherapy or Radical Prostatectomy.
Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
70 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disease progression patterns and association of prostate-specific antigen level with risk of progression in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Trial
- Early Identification and Management of Biochemical Recurrence Following Radical Prostatectomy.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Review
- Oncologic Outcomes in a Contemporary "PROTEUS-like" Cohort of High-risk Prostate Cancer Treated with Radical Prostatectomy Without Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy.European urology open science · 2026Article
- Head-to-head comparison of MRI-based PI-RR scoring system and 68 Ga-PSMA-PET/CT: enhancing prostate cancer recurrence detection after radical prostatectomy.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- No racial disparities in prostate cancer-specific mortality after biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Article
- Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy Followed by Robotic Radical Prostatectomy in High-Risk Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Pilot Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a preoperativeEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Intermediate clinical endpoints as surrogates for overall survival after salvage prostatectomy.BJU international · 2026Article
- Article
- Perioperative propranolol during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot trial (PeP-RALP).BJUI compass · 2026Article
- An O-glycosylation-based prognostic signature for biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer identifiesTranslational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- From Detection to Surveillance: The Evolving Role of Micro-Ultrasound in Prostate Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Biochemical recurrence following definitive treatment of prostate cancer in Brazil: a retrospective cohort study.BMC urology · 2026Observational
- Neoadjuvant intraprostatic immunotherapy for high-risk localized prostate cancer.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Article
- Estimation and Prognostic Role of Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Doubling Time After Radical Prostatectomy.European urology open science · 2026Article
- Pro-neuropeptide Y as a circulating biomarker for poor prognosis in prostate cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Prostate Cancer Treatment: Cryoablation in Context.Cancers · 2026Review
- Salvage prostatectomy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiation: a narrative review of indications, outcomes, and surgical advancements.World journal of urology · 2026Review
- Biomarkers for Precision Prognosis in Prostate Cancer: Imaging, Molecular, and Integrated Approaches.Cancers · 2026Review
10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Stratifying patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) after primary treatment for prostate cancer based on the risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) is essential for determining the need for further testing and treatments. Objective: To evaluate the association of BCR after radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy and its current risk stratification with PCSM. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cohort study included a total of 16 311 male patients with 10 364 (64%) undergoing radical prostatectomy and 5947 (36%) undergoing radiotherapy with curative intent (cT1-3, cM0) and PSA follow-up in Stockholm, Sweden, between 2003 and 2019. Follow-up for all patients was until death, emigration, or end of the study (ie, December 31, 2018). Data were analyzed between September 2022 and March 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes of the study were the cumulative incidence of BCR and PCSM. Patients with BCR were stratified in low- and high-risk according to European Association of Urology (EAU) criteria. Exposures: Radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy. Results: A total of 16 311 patients were included. Median (IQR) age was 64 (59-68) years in the radical prostatectomy cohort (10 364 patients) and 69 (64-73) years in the radiotherapy cohort (5947 patients). Median (IQR) follow-up for survivors was 88 (55-138) months and 89 (53-134) months, respectively. Following radical prostatectomy, the 15-year cumulative incidences of BCR were 16% (95% CI, 15%-18%) for the 4024 patients in the low D'Amico risk group, 30% (95% CI, 27%-32%) for the 5239 patients in the intermediate D'Amico risk group, and 46% (95% CI, 42%-51%) for 1101 patients in the high D'Amico risk group. Following radiotherapy, the 15-year cumulative incidences of BCR were 18% (95% CI, 15%-21%) for the 1230 patients in the low-risk group, 24% (95% CI, 21%-26%) for the 2355 patients in the intermediate-risk group, and 36% (95% CI, 33%-39%) for the 2362 patients in the high-risk group. The 10-year cumulative incidences of PCSM after radical prostatectomy were 4% (95% CI, 2%-6%) for the 1101 patients who developed low-risk EAU-BCR and 9% (95% CI, 5%-13%) for 649 patients who developed high-risk EAU-BCR. After radiotherapy, the 10-year PCSM cumulative incidences were 24% (95% CI, 19%-29%) for the 591 patients in the low-risk EAU-BCR category and 46% (95% CI, 40%-51%) for the 600 patients in the high-risk EAU-BCR category. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest the validity of EAU-BCR stratification system. However, while the risk of dying from prostate cancer in low-risk EAU-BCR after radical prostatectomy was very low, patients who developed low-risk EAU-BCR after radiotherapy had a nonnegligible risk of prostate cancer mortality. Improving risk stratification of patients with BCR is pivotal to guide salvage treatment decisions, reduce overtreatment, and limit the number of staging tests in the event of PSA elevations after primary treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.