Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37695584›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Biochemical Recurrence and Risk of Mortality Following Radiotherapy or Radical Prostatectomy.

Ugo Giovanni Falagario, Ahmad Abbadi, Sebastiaan Remmers, Lars Björnebo, Darko Bogdanovic, Alberto Martini, Alexander Valdman, Giuseppe Carrieri, Mani Menon, Olof Akre and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
25.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Development and validation of a preoperativeEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Ugo Giovanni FalagarioDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery (Solna), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ahmad AbbadiDepartments of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sebastiaan RemmersDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Lars BjörneboDepartments of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Darko BogdanovicDepartments of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Alberto MartiniDepartment of Urology, Division of Surgery, The Univeristy of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Alexander ValdmanDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Giuseppe CarrieriDepartment of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Mani MenonDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Olof AkreDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery (Solna), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Martin EklundDepartments of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Tobias NordströmDepartments of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Henrik GrönbergDepartments of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anna LantzDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery (Solna), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Peter WiklundDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery (Solna), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USUniversity of Foggia · ITErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Stratifying patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) after primary treatment for prostate cancer based on the risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) is essential for determining the need for further testing and treatments. Objective: To evaluate the association of BCR after radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy and its current risk stratification with PCSM. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cohort study included a total of 16 311 male patients with 10 364 (64%) undergoing radical prostatectomy and 5947 (36%) undergoing radiotherapy with curative intent (cT1-3, cM0) and PSA follow-up in Stockholm, Sweden, between 2003 and 2019. Follow-up for all patients was until death, emigration, or end of the study (ie, December 31, 2018). Data were analyzed between September 2022 and March 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes of the study were the cumulative incidence of BCR and PCSM. Patients with BCR were stratified in low- and high-risk according to European Association of Urology (EAU) criteria. Exposures: Radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy. Results: A total of 16 311 patients were included. Median (IQR) age was 64 (59-68) years in the radical prostatectomy cohort (10 364 patients) and 69 (64-73) years in the radiotherapy cohort (5947 patients). Median (IQR) follow-up for survivors was 88 (55-138) months and 89 (53-134) months, respectively. Following radical prostatectomy, the 15-year cumulative incidences of BCR were 16% (95% CI, 15%-18%) for the 4024 patients in the low D'Amico risk group, 30% (95% CI, 27%-32%) for the 5239 patients in the intermediate D'Amico risk group, and 46% (95% CI, 42%-51%) for 1101 patients in the high D'Amico risk group. Following radiotherapy, the 15-year cumulative incidences of BCR were 18% (95% CI, 15%-21%) for the 1230 patients in the low-risk group, 24% (95% CI, 21%-26%) for the 2355 patients in the intermediate-risk group, and 36% (95% CI, 33%-39%) for the 2362 patients in the high-risk group. The 10-year cumulative incidences of PCSM after radical prostatectomy were 4% (95% CI, 2%-6%) for the 1101 patients who developed low-risk EAU-BCR and 9% (95% CI, 5%-13%) for 649 patients who developed high-risk EAU-BCR. After radiotherapy, the 10-year PCSM cumulative incidences were 24% (95% CI, 19%-29%) for the 591 patients in the low-risk EAU-BCR category and 46% (95% CI, 40%-51%) for the 600 patients in the high-risk EAU-BCR category. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest the validity of EAU-BCR stratification system. However, while the risk of dying from prostate cancer in low-risk EAU-BCR after radical prostatectomy was very low, patients who developed low-risk EAU-BCR after radiotherapy had a nonnegligible risk of prostate cancer mortality. Improving risk stratification of patients with BCR is pivotal to guide salvage treatment decisions, reduce overtreatment, and limit the number of staging tests in the event of PSA elevations after primary treatment.

Indexed as

Prostate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsAgedCohort StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstateProstatectomyProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID37695584
PMCPMC10495864
OpenAlexW4386592882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.