ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2023
Visual Function after Implantation of Diffractive Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses in Eyes with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes of an Isofocal Optic-Design Intraocular Lens with Double C-Loop Haptics in Eyes with Glaucoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Visual outcomes in patients with bilateral early to moderate primary open-angle glaucoma following wavefront-shaping partial-range of field-extend intraocular lens implantation.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Premium Intraocular Lenses in Glaucoma Patients Undergoing Combined Cataract and Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Clinical Outcomes Following Bilateral Implantation of a Next-Generation Intraocular Lens in Patients with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Visual, Refractive, and Functional Outcomes after Implantation of an Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens in Patients with Stable and Mild Glaucoma.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Article
- Outcomes of a non-diffractive extended depth of focus intraocular lens in patients with well-controlled glaucoma and ocular hypertension.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Influence of Visual Field on Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity in Open-Angle Glaucoma Eyes with Monofocal and Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2024Article
- Editorial: Insights in glaucoma: 2023.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Performance of Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens in Eyes with Preexisting Retinal Disease.Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aim of this prospective study was to compare the visual functions of extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses (EDOF IOLs) and monofocal IOLs in eyes with mild to moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).
methodsCataractous eyes with POAG controlled using medical treatments, no central visual field defects, and mean deviation (MD) values of -10 dB or better on the 30-2 test grid of the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm standard program were included. Twenty-two eyes of 22 patients received EDOF IOLs (ZXR00V and ZXV150-375; J&J), whereas 24 eyes of 24 patients received monofocal IOLs (ZCB00V and ZCV150-375; J&J). MD values, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and photopic contrast sensitivity were measured at 3 months after surgery. Noninferiority of CDVA and contrast sensitivity in eyes with EDOF IOLs to eyes with monofocal IOLs were examined.
resultsThe postoperative mean MDs of eyes with EDOF and monofocal IOLs were -2.76 dB and -4.21 dB with no significant difference. The CDVA of eyes with EDOF IOLs was noninferior to that of eyes with monofocal IOLs (P = 0.02). There were no inferiority in contrast sensitivity at any spatial frequency (P < 0.001).
conclusionsThe visual function of EDOF IOLs in eyes with mild-to-moderate POAG was not inferior to that of monofocal IOLs.
trial registrationRegistered in the Japan Registry for Clinical Research (identifier: jRCTs032200218).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.