Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37695464›Full record

ReviewAnnals of intensive care2023

Virtual and augmented reality in intensive care medicine: a systematic review.

Dominika Kanschik, Raphael Romano Bruno, Georg Wolff, Malte Kelm, Christian Jung

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of intensive care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
20.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Addressing challenges for virtual reality applications in the ICU.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dominika KanschikDepartment of Cardiology, Pulmonology, and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Raphael Romano BrunoDepartment of Cardiology, Pulmonology, and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Georg WolffDepartment of Cardiology, Pulmonology, and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Malte KelmDepartment of Cardiology, Pulmonology, and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Christian JungDepartment of Cardiology, Pulmonology, and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany. Christian.jung@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8325-250X
Düsseldorf University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVirtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) are rapidly developing technologies that offer a wide range of applications and enable users to experience digitally rendered content in both physical and virtual space. Although the number of studies about the different use of VR and AR increases year by year, a systematic overview of the applications of these innovative technologies in intensive care medicine is lacking. The aim of this systematic review was to provide a detailed summary of how VR and AR are currently being used in various areas of intensive care medicine.

methodsWe systematically searched PubMed until 1st March 2023 to identify the currently existing evidence for different applications of VR and AR for both health care providers in the intensive care unit and children or adults, who were in an intensive care unit because of a critical illness.

resultsAfter screening the literature, a total of 59 studies were included. Of note, a substantial number of publications consists of case reports, study plans or are lacking a control group. Furthermore, study designs are seldom comparable. However, there have been a variety of use cases for VR and AR that researchers have explored. They can help intensive care unit (ICU) personnel train, plan, and perform difficult procedures such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation, vascular punctures, endotracheal intubation or percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Patients might benefit from VR during invasive interventions and ICU stay by alleviating stress or pain. Furthermore, it enables contact with relatives and can also assist patients in their rehabilitation programs.

conclusionBoth, VR and AR, offer multiple possibilities to improve current care, both from the perspective of the healthcare professional and the patient. It can be assumed that VR and AR will develop further and their application in health care will increase.

Indexed as

Augmented realityImagingIntensive care medicineMixed realityVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID37695464
PMCPMC10495307
OpenAlexW4386592795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.