Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37695434›Full record

Observational studyJapanese journal of ophthalmology2023

Clinical presentations of acquired comitant esotropia in 5-35 years old Japanese and digital device usage: a multicenter registry data analysis study.

Hirohito Iimori, Sachiko Nishina, Osamu Hieda, Toshiaki Goseki, Noriko Nishikawa, Sadao Suzuki, Akiko Hikoya, Miwa Komori, Hiroko Suzuki, Tomoyo Yoshida and 11 more

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy, durability, and safety of faricimab up to every 16 weeks in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration: 2-year results from the Japan subgroup of the phase III TENAYA trial.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.

Hirohito IimoriDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handa-yama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Sachiko NishinaDivision of Ophthalmology, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Osamu HiedaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Toshiaki GosekiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kitasato University, Sagamihara, Japan.
Noriko NishikawaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan.
Sadao SuzukiDepartment of Public Health, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan.
Akiko HikoyaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handa-yama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Miwa KomoriDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handa-yama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Hiroko SuzukiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handa-yama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Tomoyo YoshidaDivision of Ophthalmology, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Shion HayashiDivision of Ophthalmology, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Takafumi MoriDepartment of Ophthalmology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Akiko KimuraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Takeshi MorimotoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Yukiko ShimizuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saneikai Tsukazaki Hospital, Himeji, Japan.
Takashi NegishiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Fuculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Tamami ShimizuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handa-yama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Yoshimi YokoyamaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Chukyo Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Yoshiko SugiyamaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Noriyuki AzumaDivision of Ophthalmology, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Miho SatoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handa-yama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, Japan. mihosato@hama-med.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0389-6274
Hamamatsu University School of Medicine · JPNational Center For Child Health and Development · JPAsahikawa Medical University · JPFukushima Medical University · JPHyogo University · JPInternational University Of Health And Welfare Atami Hospital · JPJapan Community Healthcare Organization · JPJuntendo University · JPKanazawa University · JPKyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPNagoya City University · JPSaga University · JPThe University of Osaka · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University · JPYamagata University · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science London JP20K0978National center for child health 2021B-6National center for child health 30-23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe clinical presentations of acquired comitant esotropia and digital device use in children, adolescents, and young adults without neurological problems. STUDY

designMulticenter prospective observational study.

methodsPatients with acquired comitant esotropia, without intracranial diseases aged 5-35 years at the time of visit, who were seen at pre-registered facilities within 1 year of onset were enrolled. The duration from the onset of symptoms and the time of digital device usage approximately 1 month before onset and their lifestyles were surveyed. Visual acuity, cycloplegic refraction, and strabismus angles were measured. Data were analyzed in three age groups (Child: 5-12 years, Adolescent: 13-18 years, and Young adult: 19-35 years).

resultsBetween November 2019 and December 2021, 218 patients were enrolled from 55 facilities, and 194 patients (including 62 children, 69 adolescents, and 63 young adults) were analyzed. The child group spent the least amount of time using digital devices (children: 159; adolescents: 210; young adults: 267 min/work day, p < 0.05; (mean time in the same order below) 229, 338, 314 min/holiday, p < 0.05) and had the largest strabismus angle (mean strabismus angle at near: 30, 22, 18 PD, p < 0.01; at far: 28, 26, 21 PD, p<0.05).

conclusionThe clinical features of acquired comitant esotropia and hand-held digital device usage differed between children aged ≤ 12 years and older patients. This report gives the current clinical characteristics of young patients with acquired esotropia and digital device usage.

Indexed as

EsotropiaStrabismusAcute DiseaseAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolData AnalysisEast Asian PeopleHumansOculomotor MusclesRetrospective StudiesVisual AcuityYoung AdultAcquired comitant esotropiaDigital deviceDistant esotropiaEsotropiaSmartphone

Identifiers

PMID37695434
OpenAlexW4386592057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.