ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023
[Hip dysplasia].
Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- A nationwide survey on the information preferences of parents of children with developmental dysplasia of the hip compared with pediatric orthopedic surgeons' perspectives.Journal of pediatric orthopedics. Part B · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHip dysplasia is one of the most common malformations in childhood and has a significant impact on the further life of those affected. A distinction must be made between congenital and the much rarer acquired dysplasia. Early diagnosis and therapy are pivotal for further development of patients.
objectivesThe paper gives an overview of current radiological possibilities of diagnosis with focus on congenital hip dysplasia supplemented by insights into therapeutic options. MATERIALS AND
methodsBasic and review papers were analyzed.
resultsClinical examination of the newborn has low sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of hip dysplasia. The introduction of Graf ultrasound screening has significantly improved the early detection of dysplastic hips. With the help of sonography, but also magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the shape of the acetabulum and the position of the femoral head in the socket can be precisely and quickly determined, while X‑ray examinations have their place especially in the context of follow-up examinations after treatment from the age of 1 year and in the diagnosis of secondary dysplasia. Therapeutic options range from spreading treatment to open reduction with fixation in the newborn as well as conversion osteotomy in older children.
conclusionEarly detection of hip dysplasia is critical to the course of treatment. The right choice of examination method and correct performance are essential for further treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.