Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37695370›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2023

Accurate, automated taxonomic assignment of genebank accessions: a new method demonstrated using high-throughput marker data from 10,000 Capsicum spp. accessions.

M Timothy Rabanus-Wallace, Nils Stein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M Timothy Rabanus-WallaceLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Gatersleben, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany. mtrw85@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4663-985X
Nils SteinThe University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageWe demonstrate how an algorithm that uses cheap genetic marker data can ensure the taxonomic assignments of genebank samples are complete, intuitive, and consistent-which enhances their value. To maximise the benefit of genebank resources, accurate and complete taxonomic assignments are imperative. The rise of genebank genomics allows genetic methods to be used to ensure this, but these need to be largely automated since the number of samples dealt with is too great for efficient manual recategorisation, however no clearly optimal method has yet arisen. A recent landmark genebank genomic study sequenced over 10,000 genebank accessions of peppers (Capsicum spp.), a species of great commercial, cultural, and scientific importance, which suffers from much taxonomic ambiguity. Similar datasets will, in coming decades, be produced for hundreds of plant taxa, affording a perfect opportunity to develop automated taxonomic correction methods in advance of the incipient genebank genomics explosion, alongside providing insights into pepper taxonomy in general. We present a marker-based taxonomic assignment approach that combines ideas from several standard classification algorithms, resulting in a highly flexible and customisable classifier suitable to impose intuitive assignments, even in highly reticulated species groups with complex population structures and evolutionary histories. Our classifier performs favourably compared with key alternative methods. Possible sensible alterations to pepper taxonomy based on the results are proposed for discussion by the relevant communities.

Indexed as

CapsicumAlgorithmsBiological EvolutionCamphorMentholVegetablesCamphorMenthol

Identifiers

PMID37695370
PMCPMC10495273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.