Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37695364›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

The first quick olfactory test specific for Alzheimer's disease and French culture.

Anais Feing-Kwong-Chan, Valeria Manera, Magali Payne, Alexandre Derreumaux, Justine Lemaire, Guillaume Sacco, Aurélie Mouton, Alexandra Plonka, Xavier Fernandez, Clair Vandersteen and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anais Feing-Kwong-ChanDépartement d'Orthophonie, UFR Médecine de Nice, Nice, France. fkc.anais@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-3144-2487
Valeria ManeraDépartement d'Orthophonie, UFR Médecine de Nice, Nice, France.
Magali PayneDépartement d'Orthophonie, UFR Médecine de Nice, Nice, France.
Alexandre DerreumauxUniversité Côte d'Azur, CoBTeK, Nice, France.
Justine LemaireUniversité Côte d'Azur, CoBTeK, Nice, France.
Guillaume SaccoDépartement d'Orthophonie, UFR Médecine de Nice, Nice, France.
Aurélie MoutonDépartement d'Orthophonie, UFR Médecine de Nice, Nice, France.
Alexandra PlonkaDépartement d'Orthophonie, UFR Médecine de Nice, Nice, France.
Xavier FernandezInstitut de Chimie, UMR 7272, Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Parc Valrose, 28 Avenue, Nice, France.
Clair VandersteenInstitut Universitaire de la Face et du Cou, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, France Valrose, 06108, Nice, France.
Auriane GrosDépartement d'Orthophonie, UFR Médecine de Nice, Nice, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOlfactory identification disorder is considered a promising early biomarker of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The QUICK TODA2 can be used as a short olfactory screening tool specific for French AD patients. The selection of AD specific odorants and the design of this screening were the main objectives of this twofold study.

methodsIn study 1, the TODA2 olfactory test was administered to 43 mild-AD patients and 45 healthy controls (HC) in five memory centres in France. The selection of AD specific odorants was based on the differences in the proportion of correct answers and in the threshold means between AD and HC groups. In study 2, another set of 19 mild-AD patient were included at the memory centre of Nice Hospital. All participants completed the olfactory assessment pipeline including the QUICK TODA2, TODA2 and Sniffin' Sticks Identification sub-Test (SST-i). The individual scores of the three tests were correlated.

resultsIn study 1, ten TODA2 odorants could significantly differentiate AD participants from controls. We selected the six most AD-sensitive items to design the QUICK TODA2. In study 2, we reported strong significant correlations between QUICK TODA2 and TODA2 (ρ

conclusionQUICK TODA2 is a 5-min non-invasive olfactory AD screening tool dedicated to French culture. Its results converge with those of longer, validated olfactory tests. It could be used as a quick screening tool in the general daily practice before an extensive assessment in memory centres.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseOlfaction DisordersBiomarkersHumansOdorantsSmellBiomarkersAlzheimer’s diseaseCognitive impairmentOlfaction, olfactory testOlfactory identification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.