Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37694300›Full record

ArticleImmunology and cell biology

Defining the proteomic landscape of cultured macrophages and their polarization continuum.

Tiah Cl Oates, Pedro L Moura, Stephen Cross, Kiren Roberts, Holly E Baum, Katy L Haydn-Smith, Marieangela C Wilson, Kate J Heesom, Charlotte E Severn, Ashley M Toye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Immunology and cell biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. A new osteogenic protein isolated fromBioactive materials · 2023
    Article
  13. Macrophage Repolarization as a Therapeutic Strategy for Osteosarcoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tiah Cl OatesSchool of Biochemistry, Biomedical Sciences Building, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2618-101X
Pedro L MouraCenter for Haematology and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Medicine (MedH), Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0493-5394
Stephen CrossUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3565-0479
Kiren RobertsSchool of Biochemistry, Biomedical Sciences Building, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Holly E BaumMax Planck Bristol Centre for Minimal Biology, School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Katy L Haydn-SmithSchool of Biochemistry, Biomedical Sciences Building, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Marieangela C WilsonProteomics Facility, Biomedical Sciences Building, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6218-3533
Kate J HeesomProteomics Facility, Biomedical Sciences Building, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Charlotte E SevernSchool of Biochemistry, Biomedical Sciences Building, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7634-3825
Ashley M ToyeSchool of Biochemistry, Biomedical Sciences Building, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4395-9396

Funding

Department of Health IS-BTU-1214-10032Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 8043 WT 108907/Z/15/Z Dynamic Cell
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macrophages have previously been characterized based on phenotypical and functional differences into suggested simplified subtypes of MØ, M1, M2a and M2c. These macrophage subtypes can be generated in a well-established primary monocyte culture model that produces cells expressing accepted subtype surface markers. To determine how these subtypes retain functional similarities and better understand their formation, we generated all four subtypes from the same donors. Comparative whole-cell proteomics confirmed that four distinct macrophage subtypes could be induced from the same donor material, with > 50% of 5435 identified proteins being significantly altered in abundance between subtypes. Functional assessment highlighted that these distinct protein expression profiles are primed to enable specific cell functions, indicating that this shifting proteome is predictive of meaningful changes in cell characteristics. Importantly, the 2552 proteins remained consistent in abundance across all macrophage subtypes examined, demonstrating maintenance of a stable core proteome that likely enables swift polarity changes. We next explored the cross-polarization capabilities of preactivated M1 macrophages treated with dexamethasone. Importantly, these treated cells undergo a partial repolarization toward the M2c surface markers but still retain the M1 functional phenotype. Our investigation of polarized macrophage subtypes therefore provides evidence of a sliding scale of macrophage functionality, with these data sets providing a valuable benchmark resource for further studies of macrophage polarity, with relevance for cell therapy development and drug discovery.

Indexed as

ProteomeProteomicsCells, CulturedMacrophagesMonocytesProteomedexamethasonemacrophagemacrophage subtypepolarizationproteomics

Identifiers

PMID37694300
PMCPMC10953363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.