Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37694229›Full record

ArticleClinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science2023

Lack of Sample Diversity in Research on Adolescent Depression and Social Media Use: A Scoping Review and Meta-Analysis.

Sakshi Ghai, Luisa Fassi, Faisal Awadh, Amy Orben

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. How public involvement can improve the science of AI.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Reducing Social Media Use Decreases Depression Symptoms: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sakshi GhaiDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8488-0273
Luisa FassiMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0520-6425
Faisal AwadhSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0023-3157
Amy OrbenMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2937-4183

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on whether social media use relates to adolescent depression is rapidly increasing. However, is it adequately representing the diversity of global adolescent populations? We conducted a preregistered scoping review (research published between 2018 and 2020; 34 articles) to investigate the proportion of studies recruiting samples from the Global North versus Global South and assess whether the association between social media and depression varies depending on the population being studied. Sample diversity was lacking between regions: More than 70% of studies examined Global North populations. The link between social media and depression was positive and significant in the Global North but null and nonsignificant in the Global South. There was also little evidence of diversity within regions in both sampling choices and reporting of participants' demographics. Given that most adolescents live in the Global South and sample diversity is crucial for the generalizability of research findings, urgent action is needed to address these oversights.

Indexed as

adolescencedepressionGlobal NorthGlobal Southsample diversitysocial mediasocial-networking sitesteenyouths

Identifiers

PMID37694229
PMCPMC10491482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.