Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37694172›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2023

CutFEM forward modeling for EEG source analysis.

Tim Erdbrügger, Andreas Westhoff, Malte Höltershinken, Jan-Ole Radecke, Yvonne Buschermöhle, Alena Buyx, Fabrice Wallois, Sampsa Pursiainen, Joachim Gross, Rebekka Lencer and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Physiologically Guided Modeling for EEG Multichannel Signals.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tim ErdbrüggerInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Andreas WesthoffInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Malte HöltershinkenInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Jan-Ole RadeckeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Yvonne BuschermöhleInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Alena BuyxInstitute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Fabrice WalloisInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France.
Sampsa PursiainenComputing Sciences Unit, Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Joachim GrossInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Rebekka LencerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Christian EngwerInstitute for Analysis and Numerics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Carsten WoltersInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Source analysis of Electroencephalography (EEG) data requires the computation of the scalp potential induced by current sources in the brain. This so-called EEG forward problem is based on an accurate estimation of the volume conduction effects in the human head, represented by a partial differential equation which can be solved using the finite element method (FEM). FEM offers flexibility when modeling anisotropic tissue conductivities but requires a volumetric discretization, a mesh, of the head domain. Structured hexahedral meshes are easy to create in an automatic fashion, while tetrahedral meshes are better suited to model curved geometries. Tetrahedral meshes, thus, offer better accuracy but are more difficult to create. Methods: We introduce CutFEM for EEG forward simulations to integrate the strengths of hexahedra and tetrahedra. It belongs to the family of unfitted finite element methods, decoupling mesh and geometry representation. Following a description of the method, we will employ CutFEM in both controlled spherical scenarios and the reconstruction of somatosensory-evoked potentials. Results: CutFEM outperforms competing FEM approaches with regard to numerical accuracy, memory consumption, and computational speed while being able to mesh arbitrarily touching compartments. Discussion: CutFEM balances numerical accuracy, computational efficiency, and a smooth approximation of complex geometries that has previously not been available in FEM-based EEG forward modeling.

Indexed as

EEG forward problemfinite element methodlevel setrealistic head modelingunfitted FEMvolume conductor modeling

Identifiers

PMID37694172
PMCPMC10488711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.