Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37693760›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023

Kinematic analysis of movement patterns during a reach-and-grasp task in stroke patients.

Hyoseon Choi, Dongho Park, Dong-Wook Rha, Hyo Suk Nam, Yea Jin Jo, Deog Young Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Task-Based Mapping of Compensatory Strategies and Movement Kinematics After Stroke: A Systematic Scoping Review.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. What networks in the brain system sustain imagination?Frontiers in network physiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hyoseon ChoiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dongho ParkGeorge W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Dong-Wook RhaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyo Suk NamDepartment of Neurology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yea Jin JoResearch Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Deog Young KimDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yonsei University · KRGeorgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the kinematic movement patterns during a reach-and-grasp task in post-stroke patients according to the upper extremity impairment severity. Methods: Subacute stroke patients ( Results: The severe group showed a significantly longer movement time, lower peak velocity, and higher number of movement units than the mild group during the reach-and-grasp task ( Conclusion: Post-stroke patients have unique spatiotemporal and kinematic movement patterns during a reach-and grasp-task according to the impairment severity.

Indexed as

activities of daily livingbiomechanical phenomenarehabilitationstrokeupper extremity

Identifiers

PMID37693760
PMCPMC10484108
OpenAlexW4386126220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.